There’s not much difference between the Bushnell Launch Pro and the GC3 launch monitors. The only factor that sets both devices apart is the pricing model, which confuses many buyers.
I’m fortunate to own these two launch monitors, so I’ve created this article to break down the offerings of each of them.
_____________________________
KEY TAKEAWAYS
Bushnell Launch Pro and the GC3 Launch Monitor look the same in appearance. Only one is branded as “Foresight Sports,” while the other is branded as “Bushnell Golf/Foresight Sports.”
In terms of performance, both devices perform the same. These launch monitors are built on the same technology and provide the same set of data and features.
Both devices are celebrated as among the best launch monitor/simulator products on the market, so you can’t go wrong by choosing any of them.
The only difference between both is the pricing model. The GC3 gives you the shooting match right out of the box, while the Bushnell Launch Pro lets you buy just the features that interest you.
Foresight GC3 will set you back $7,000 with access to all functionality out of the box. The Bushnell Launch Pro retails at $3,500 with access to basic functions. You need to pay $199, $249, $499, or $699 per year for advanced features, depending on the software package.
_____________________________
You can see that the Bushnell Launch Pro and Foresight GC3 share a lot of similarities. But I will still detail the specific features of both devices.
Image
Product
Detail
Price
Bushnell Launch Pro
This launch monitor measures 5″ x 6″ x 12″, weighing 5 lbs, with a 3″ x 2″ touchscreen display. It offers various ball data points, with 5-7 hours of battery life, Wi-Fi, and PC connectivity.
Enhanced by integration with the FSX performance and gaming suite. Its superior design and quality materials guarantee reliable and accurate performance.
Note: Buying a new Bushnell Launch Pro monitor instantly gives you access to the Basic software subscription, where the above-listed metrics are enjoyed for one year of usage. So, if you want to continue using the above metrics after one year of free use, you pay $249 annually.
To use the Bushnell Launch Pro as a simulator, you need to subscribe to either the Silver or Gold software package. While both premium packages include everything in the Basic plan, the Silver package, for $499 per year, gives you five simulated golf courses and allows for up to four players.
On the other hand, the Gold package costs $699 per year and comes with ten courses and eight players.
ForeSight GC3 Pricing Model and Offerings
After buying the Foresight GC3 launch monitor for $7,000, you enjoy everything the Bushnell Pro can do without an annual software package. So it’s a one-time purchase, which explains why it’s more expensive at the initial purchase than the Bushnell Launch Pro.
If you can afford it, it’s a pretty good deal, right?
The issue is that, as much as the price point is a steal, not everyone would need all those metrics. So, paying $7,000 is hard to justify. Even if you need all the metrics, the golf technology trend keeps evolving, and innovation can hit the market that would outlive the offerings of the GC3.
In such a scenario, people with the Launch Pro are at an advantage because the innovation can be integrated into their launch monitors through subscriptions.
A recent update on the Foresight Sports GC3 and Bushnell Launch Pro Updates devices allows users to access the GC3 Ball Enabled—a configuration of the GC3 launch monitor with ball data only—now available in this exclusive website bundle.
It includes FSX Play, FSX 2020, FSX Pro, and 25 golf courses.
I like how the golf simulator videos in the video below explain the necessary details of this upgrade, including the latest pricing, software changes, integration, Peer 2 Peer Beta, and more:
So which should you go for?
The best device to opt for between the Bushnell Launch Pro and GC3 depends on your budget and what you need a launch monitor for.
There are not many things to discuss on the side of performance, accuracy, and appearance. Both devices are identical, if not equal. The main concern is the pricing model and ensuring you’re getting enough value for your money.
If you don’t want all the robust features of an advanced launch monitor that the Foresight GC3 offers at a one-time price, there’s no need to splurge. All you need is Launch Pro with a basic subscription.
Even with the price of the GC3, you can afford a Launch Pro plus 15 years of Basic Software (remember, the first year is free).
Even when you’re going for the Launch Pro silver plan, the price of the GC3 can afford you seven years of subscription. And if you bought the Gold subscription with a Launch Pro, it would take five years before you spent what you would on a GC3.
However, if you hate subscriptions, the Foresight GC3 is the right option for you. You make a one-time purchase, have access to all the data you need and don’t need, and forget about paying annual bills.
After all, it’s better to have it and not need it than to need it and not have it.
The Cube rangefinder by CaddyTalk, USA, is unique in a crowded market. It’s small, lightweight, and has a lot of sharp-looking corners. But does it outperform its peers on more than just looks and size? I decided to test and review this unique device to provide information in case you’re considering it.
Long story short, the CandyTalk Cube rangefinder offers crystal-clear optics, seamless mode-switching, and standout features like environmental slope and triangulation calculation. It’s compact, light, and easy to use, quickly locking onto targets with clear readings. While the side panel display is a neat feature, the triangulation mode stands out for its accuracy, especially on cart path-only days. It’s a worthwhile investment.
The Cube rangefinder was one product at the 2023 PGA merchandise show that caught a lot of people off guard, and it’s probably one of the smallest products at the show.
In this review, I’m going to walk you through my experience using the Cube rangefinder, its major benefits and drawbacks, and other relevant information to help you decide if the device is worth your investment.
CaddyTalk Cube Rangefinder Specifications
One of the key highlights of this cube rangefinder is its world-patented triangulation technology. It allows you to pin the ball (or first point) and the flag (2nd point) from a different standing point (3rd point).
CaddyTalk Cube Rangefinder
$350
Weighing only 1.95 pounds, the Cube Rangefinder is ultra-lightweight and highly portable
The two-way divider top can accommodate 6 to 7 clubs, making it ideal for shorter games.
The rangefinder features an accessory pocket that offers enough space for golf essentials like balls, tees, a pencil, and a marker.
CandyTalk is associated with Golf Zone, which is among the biggest brands in South Korea in terms of screen, indoor, or simulation golf. This sets the tone for my perception of the product.
The first positive impression was its compatibility, which is a good thing but can be a not-so-great factor. I compared the size and width of this rangefinder with my Redmi Note 10 mobile device and noticed how portable the rangefinder is.
It is an answered prayer for players looking for handy, tiny devices. But the reason why I said it can be a bad thing is because players with bigger hands may find this too small, especially if you’re used to operating rangefinders with both hands. It’s impractical to do that with the CandyTalk Cube—an overkill, at best.
I also like the square shape that makes it stand out from other options like Bushnell V4 and Callaway, where the edges protrude, making it a little difficult to save space with them.
The design and appearance of the Cube rangefinder have more of a retro appeal. The color is neutral and has no attention-grabbing aesthetic. This is an ideal option for those who value minimal design in their golf equipment.
I also love the casing that the device comes with. The key design specifications for the CaddyTalk Cube rangefinder are as follows:
Key design details:
USB-C port and cable for convenient recharging
Full charge allows up to approx. 10,000 actuations.
IP55 water resistance protects the laser from water and dust.
Includes CUBE hard case
In terms of operational design, the Cube rangefinder has everything you’d expect: laser distances to any target on the golf course, GPS capabilities, slope, red/black optics, and a decent degree of accuracy.
What truly sets it apart, however, is CaddyTalk’s patented triangular distance Caddy Mode, which I will talk about in full detail in the next section.
Performance
The CandyTalk Cube works like any other rangefinder. It has a viewer that you can adjust, the power button, and the target shoot for a hit.
The first notable and outstanding performance point of this rangefinder is the side panel display that shows the data on the body of the device, so you don’t always have to look into the rangefinder to see the data. It is also cool to show your buddies on the golf course instead of having them view the hole on the device.
It has a nice bright red and a little bit of green for its aimer and the crosshairs when trying to find your target, which makes it conveniently visible.
You can also turn the slope function on and off, which makes the device tournament legal.
Another interesting part is that the Cube rangefinder accounts for temperature, altitude, and humidity in the calculation, telling you how hot or humid it is. As you probably know, when these two factors go up, the ball goes farther. So, the devices also act like a caddy.
The coolest aspect of the CaddyTalk Cube rangefinder has to be the triangulation ability.
What this means is that this triangular distance capability expands the amount of information you can obtain prior to every shot.
Imagine a situation where you’re playing golf, and it’s cart path only, and you want to grab a club without taking your whole bag over to the ball, but you don’t know exactly how far you have yet. It will be tiring to just walk over to the ball, shoot the number, walk back, take your club, and take extra time.
So this rangefinder will allow you to shoot two objects—first the ball, then the flag (or whatever location you want)—and it will give you the distance between those two points so then you can determine how far you have without getting all the way to the ball to figure it out.
Price Value
The CaddyTalk Cube rangefinder, as of the time of writing, retails for $350 per unit on Amazon, and it’s the same price on the brand’s official website.
When you buy the product, it comes with a case, black pouch, USB-C port, and cable.
Is the price worth it? I’d say yes. Many rangefinders on the market cost more but do not offer half the features and performance of the Cube rangefinder.
While it’s not the most affordable option or far from being a bang for the buck, it’s worth the penny.
Meanwhile, when you consider how the Cube rangefinder blends the benefit of a laser rangefinder with the use of a GPS, you’ll see reasons to splurge $350 on this device.
Cube Rangefinder: Pros and Cons
Indeed, there’s no perfect product out there. There are always two sides to the coin. To further help you decide if this rangefinder is best for you, consider the pros and cons that I’ve observed:
Pros
World-patented triangulation technology
Results of environmental conditions such as temperature, altitude, and humidity for improved accuracy
Full charge allows up to approx. 10,000 actuations.
IP55 water resistance protects the laser from water and dust.
Includes CUBE hard case
Super compact
Cons
It can be too small for players with bigger hands.
The design appears a bit industrial or “mechanical” with hard edges, but it is not necessarily a significant problem.
It’s not pocket-friendly for buyers on a tight budget, but it’s worth the price.
Verdict Summary
The overriding takeaway from this Cube rangefinder is that it’s just different enough to be worth buying because it has more innovation.
Many products in the marketplace are not innovative. They’re just there to be there, and they cost you money. When you buy them, they just perform a function.
In contrast, the Cube rangefinder has some cool bells and whistles that I think your friends will ask you about.
That being said, here’s my rating for this device based on my experience with it:
Rating
CaddyTalk Cube Rangefinder
Optics
10
Accuracy
9
Performance
8
Display
10
Ease of Use
10
Looks
8
TOTAL (60 points):
55 Points
Over to you: what do you think about this portable CaddyTalk Cube rangefinder? I’d love to hear your thoughts in the comment section below.
We can all agree that golf bags have increased in size as they introduce more features and newer designs. But sometimes, we only need a smaller bag to head out to play just a few holes. This is the usefulness of a Sunday golf bag.
These smaller, lightweight golf bags are designed to hold about 6 to 8 golf clubs. I’ve tested eight of the best options if you want to invest in a Sunday golf bag.
Here’s a list of the best Sunday golf bags and why I recommend them:
The one time it dawned on me that I’d need a Sunday golf bag was when I was on a driving holiday in the summer through France and hoped to play some golf. Due to space constraints, I didn’t take my full bag and had to invest in something compact. The Sunday Golf Loma bag caught my attention, and I’ve been using it with five clubs: 5W, 7i, 9i, 52, and putter. It has been bliss.
In the rest of this buying guide, I will review these top recommendations, showing you their pros and cons to give you a clearer idea of which is best for you and your budget.
Best Sunday Golf Bags Compared
In the table below, I have compared my top recommendations of Sunday golf bags based on crucial factors that will help you make a quicker decision on which of the bags suits you best, in case you’re in a hurry:
Sunday Golf Bags
Weight
Dividers
Pockets
Stands
Price
LOMA BAG
Under 2 pounds
2-way
4
Yes
$130
The Mule Golf Travel Bag
4
No
$160
RYDER 23
4.9 lbs
5-way
6
Yes
$230
CaddyDaddy Golf Ranger Carry
under 3.5 pounds
3
No
$80
PING Moonlite Bag 2013
2 Pounds
2-way
No
$90
EL CAMINO
3.9 lbs
4-way
6
Yes
$190
LOMA XL
3.4 pounds
3-way
4
Yes
$170
Orlimar Pitch and Putt
1.95 pounds
2-way
1
Yes
$50
LOMA BAG
LOMA BAG
$130
Allows you to carry up to six clubs, making it a convenient and lightweight option
The velour-lined pocket is perfect for safely storing your phone, keys, and wallet while on the course
The inclusion of durable legs and a club divider adds to the bag’s functionality, making it easy to access and organize your clubs
Carrying a full set of 14 clubs to the range after work was always a hassle, and going clubless felt too tacky. But with the LOMA Sunday Golf Bag, I can comfortably carry up to six clubs, and there’s even space to store my valuables and knick-knacks.
The bag’s thoughtful features, like the insulated Frosty Pocket, which can hold two soda (or, well, “beverage”) cans or a 40-ounce drink, are fantastic.
It also has a full-length shoulder strap for convenience and a velour-lined pocket for my phone, keys, and wallet. Its Duraflex legs and club divider make it even more practical for a quick round.
The built-in stand and cushioned shoulder strap will make the golfing experience more enjoyable, especially on those cart-only days.
What I like about this bag
Available in many color options
Relatively affordable
Pockets big enough to hold my wallet and keys
A cooler bag for a couple of drinks
It looks beautiful and lightweight.
What I don’t like about this bag
The Sunday bag is OK, but some users report that the advertised weight is wrong. This 6-club bag with its stand and single strap weighs 2.75 lbs—not the “under two pounds” announced.
The Mule Golf Travel Bag
The Mule Golf Travel Bag
$160
Provides substantial club protection with its 4mm ultra-thick foam padding
Has a concealed pocket for your valuables adds convenience and security
The inclusion of a separate pocket for golf shoes and accessories makes organization easy
This bag was designed with Sunday golf bags like the Loma, Loma XL, and El Camino in mind, and it has made traveling with golf gear a breeze.
The Mule comes with several noteworthy features. It’s tall, dark, and handsome, providing a sleek and stylish look.
The 4mm ultra-thick foam protection ensures your clubs stay safe during transit. Additionally, it has a concealed valuables pocket for your items and a comfortable single strap for easy carrying.
There’s also a dedicated pocket for your golf shoes and accessories, making organization a cinch. What’s more, it boasts an easy-fold design for convenient storage.
However, it’s important to note that the Mule is specifically designed for certain golf bags, like the ones mentioned earlier, and won’t fit all bags.
While it’s a high-quality product, it has a minor drawback: the side pocket cannot be locked, which might concern some travelers.
One possible solution would be to make the side pocket accessible only from the inside to enhance security during travel.
In my experience, the Mule worked perfectly with my El Camino bag, accommodating nine clubs with padded head covers on three flights without any damage. However, I did take precautions by wrapping the shafts in a golf towel.
What I like about this bag
4mm Ultra-Thick Foam Protection
Comfy Single Strap
Easy-Fold Design for Storage
What I don’t like about this bag
Security flaw in the pocket
RYDER 23
RYDER 23
$230
The hidden flat base provides stability and makes the bag suitable for use on golf carts.
Has ample pocket space to carry all your essential items during a round.
Weighing just 4.9 lbs, the bag is lightweight and easy to transport
This full-size bag boasts a hidden flat base, self-balancing shoulder straps for comfort, and ample pocket space to carry all your essentials during a round.
One standout feature is the 4-can Frosty Pocket, ensuring your drinks stay refreshingly cold, and the Smell-Proof Pocket, a game-changer on sunny days.
Weighing just 4.9 lbs and accommodating up to 14 clubs, it’s a breeze to transport, making you question why you ever lugged around that heavy bag.
The Ryder ’23 Golf Bag also incorporates a 5-way top divider with full-length dividers, ensuring your clubs are well organized.
The bag includes a velour-lined valuables pocket and high-tech water-resistant zippers. It has a flat base suitable for golf carts and a dual-flex stand for convenience.
While it’s an excellent bag, my only nitpick is the absence of tee straps on the bag’s exterior, like the Lona has.
Nevertheless, it’s a stylish and functional bag that never fails to catch the eye of fellow golfers. I often do a double-take because it’s just that impressive.
What I like about this bag
Lightweight, stylish, and highly functional
Comfortable, adjustable strap system
Full-length dividers
Ample storage pockets
What I don’t like about this bag
Expensive
lack of tee straps on the bag’s exterior like the Lona has.
CaddyDaddy Golf Ranger Carry Sunday Travel Bag
CaddyDaddy Golf Ranger Carry
$80
With a 51-inch length and 5-inch rigid tube diameter, the bag can easily accommodate up to nine clubs, including 460-cc drivers.
The zippers are lockable for added security, although TSA locks are not included.
The padded shoulder strap and easy-grip rubber handle make carrying this bag convenient and comfortable.
The padding at the top makes the CaddyDaddy Golf Ranger Carry Sunday Travel Bag stand out, ensuring the safety of your club wedges.
Combined with its sturdy build and molded base, it provides peace of mind during travel. Its 51-inch length and 5-inch rigid tube diameter easily fit up to nine clubs, including 460-cc drivers.
Carrying this bag is a breeze, thanks to the padded shoulder strap and an easy-grip rubber handle.
Moreover, it offers a complete golfing experience with three zippered pockets and a convenient towel ring. Although the zippers are lockable, TSA locks are not included.
I used this bag with eight clubs, all featuring jumbo grips.
It perfectly accommodated my 3-wood, three irons, three wedges, and a putter.
I even had the option to bring my driver, but I preferred the 3-wood, as it served as both my tee club and fairway wood, leaving room for an extra wedge.
What I like about this bag
Affordable
Simple design
Padded top for club head protection
Easy to carry
What I don’t like about this bag
I wish the diameter were two clubs larger.
It’s very sturdy, but it would be nice to have an outside putter clip to free up easier access to clubs.
PING Moonlite Bag 2013 Carry/Sunday Golf Bag
PING Moonlite Bag 2013 Carry
$90
The 2-way top with a full-length divider is a practical feature that allows for easy organization of clubs.
The bag’s dimensions, measuring 6″ in length, 6″ in height, and 54″ in width, make it suitable for use as a carry or Sunday golf bag.
Weighing approximately 2.5 lbs, the bag’s lightweight design makes it easy to carry.
The 2-way top with a full-length divider of the PING Moonlite Bag is practical, allowing you to organize your clubs easily.
The adjustable standing strap is a handy feature, making it convenient to carry around. The bag’s dimensions, 6″ in length, 6″ in height, and 54″ in width, are quite suitable, making it a good choice for a carry/Sunday golf bag.
However, I must admit that the bag’s quality left something to be desired.
Some users report that after less than six months of occasional use, they noticed a significant issue. The bottom panel began deteriorating, and the protective film separated from the fabric.
It was disappointing to see this kind of wear and tear in such a short time, especially given that they used it rigorously.
So, the PING Moonlite Bag is a good-sized golf bag that serves its purpose if you don’t plan to use it frequently.
Its lightweight design and club-holding capacity are advantageous, but the quality concerns experienced were a downside to an otherwise practical product.
What I like about this bag
Portable
Approximately 2.5 lbs.
holds a full set of clubs
Adjustable standing strap
What I don’t like about this bag
The dual strap doesn’t get set on your shoulders as easily as others.
EL CAMINO
EL CAMINO
$190
High-tech, water-resistant zippers help keep your gear dry in various weather conditions.
The 4-way top divider is a convenient feature for organizing your clubs.
The bag is super lightweight, and the comfortable straps make it easy to carry.
The El Camino Sunday Bag’s 4-way top divider is a convenient feature, and I particularly appreciate the insulated Frosty Pocket to keep drinks cold and the velour-lined pocket for valuables.
The high-tech, water-resistant zippers ensure your gear stays dry, and the flat base is perfect for golf carts.
Although the bag doesn’t have a Brolley strap and the legs aren’t too wide, these were minor inconveniences for me.
On the plus side, the El Camino Golf Bag looks great, and the straps are incredibly comfortable and super lightweight. While it officially accommodates ten clubs, I managed to squeeze in 14, although the grips tended to catch a bit.
The bag’s numerous pockets, including some nifty mesh ones, are a real bonus.
The only drawback is its cost, especially if you need international shipping. Additionally, the bag can tip on uneven ground due to its narrower leg stance.
However, it’s a worthwhile investment, thanks to its many pockets and the handy ice pack pocket. It’s an ideal fit for your set of clubs, holding everything from irons to the driver.
Just be mindful of even weight distribution to prevent any tipping.
What I like about this bag
Looks great
The straps are very comfy, and the bag is very light.
You can squeeze 14 clubs in, but the grips will catch.
Great array of pockets, plus the little mesh pockets.
What I don’t like about this bag
It is expensive, especially if you need international shipping.
Legs don’t come out very wide.
The bag can topple on uneven ground.
No brolley strap.
LOMA XL
LOMA XL
$170
Weighing only 3.4 pounds, the bag is lightweight, making it easy to carry, even on cart-path-only restrictions.
The 3-way top divider accommodates up to 8 clubs, making it suitable for trips to the driving range or quick rounds on par-3 courses.
The frosty, insulated pocket is a notable feature, keeping drinks chilled during your game.
As the bigger sibling of the Loma Bag, this lightweight wonder at 3.4 pounds makes it a breeze to carry and ensures I’ll never shy away from cart-path-only restrictions.
What’s impressive about the Loma XL are its thoughtful design enhancements. With a 3-way top divider accommodating up to 8 clubs, it’s perfect for trips to the driving range or quick rounds on the par3 course.
Adding a padded double strap will make walking a pleasure, and the frosty pocket keeps your drinks chilled while the velour-lined pocket secures your valuables.
However, I have one minor gripe with this otherwise fantastic bag. It’s a bit tricky to stand upright without deploying the tripod feature.
The mechanism protruding from the bag’s base prevents it from resting flat, making it impossible to lean against a wall for storage.
In contrast, my full-sized bag with an integrated tripod doesn’t suffer from this issue.
Nonetheless, the Loma XL is a convenient, compact solution for those who appreciate a minimalist approach to golf.
It forces you to strategize your game with a limited club selection.
Despite the standing hiccup, you’d love the challenge this bag brings to your golfing activity.
What I like about this bag
Double-strap to enjoy the walk
3-way top divider to fit up to 8 clubs
Frosty, insulated pocket to keep your drinks cold
a velvet-lined pocket for you to store your valuable
What I don’t like about this bag
Keeping the bag up is difficult without using the tripod feature.
Orlimar Pitch and Putt Sunday Golf Bag
Orlimar Pitch and Putt
$50
Weighing only 1.95 pounds, making it easy to carry and suitable for trips to the driving range
The two-way divider top comfortably accommodates 6 to 7 clubs, which is ideal for shorter games.
It can be easily hooked onto a golf cart handle for a hassle-free ride across the fairway, ensuring your clubs are secure.
This ultra-lightweight bag, weighing only 1.95 pounds, will easily become your go-to choice for trips to the driving range, executive golf courses, Par 3 rounds, and weekend getaways.
Its two-way divider top comfortably accommodates 6 to 7 clubs, making it ideal for shorter games.
What I love most about this bag is its durability, thanks to the carry handle and adjustable shoulder strap, which give you two convenient ways to transport your clubs.
Plus, its versatility shines when you hook it onto a golf cart handle for a hassle-free ride across the fairway without worrying about your clubs getting lost or wet.
The one accessory pocket provides enough space for your golf essentials like balls, tees, a pencil, and a marker.
The retractable legs are a great addition, ensuring easy club access.
While it may not comfortably hold a full set of clubs and lacks extra room for accessory items like a water bottle or phone, this bag excels for par three rounds.
It makes club selection a breeze and enhances your overall golfing experience.
What I like about this bag
Durable material
The most affordable item on this list
Ultra lightweight
What I don’t like about this bag
Having the strap endpoints further apart (at the top of the bag and halfway down would be ideal).
Only one accessory pocket
Final Thoughts
It’s an enjoyable activity to walk on golf courses, experience the game, and chat with your golf buddies.
But when you’re lugging around a heavy stand bag full of clubs, dozens of clubs, a score of balls, plus an umbrella, such activity isn’t so much fun.
With these Sunday bag recommendations, you can buy a golf bag to eliminate this burden.
They are all lightweight, compact, and perfect for carrying a handful of clubs and a few essential accessories for your local par-3 course for some short game practice where you only need five clubs.
Steadfast Golf Shafts may not be a popular name in the golf industry, but they have been making notable waves and gaining lots of love as affordable, high-quality shafts. According to the company, this carbon shaft’s unique selling point is its advanced technology and materials that can help golfers of all skill levels improve their game. But how true is this? I decided to test and review this shaft.
After trying different stiff shafts for my Callaway Edge Big Bertha driver, I like this one the best. Long story short, I achieved a good distance and hit the shots straighter. However, the brand doesn’t seem to be doing enough to put out information that can help buyers know if this is truly what would help them. The Steadfast Golf shaft is worth the shot if it swings around 90 mph or less if you’re a senior player like me.
In the rest of this article, I’ll walk you through this safe, how it performed, and other relevant details so you can better determine if it’s a good option for you. To begin with, let’s look at the specifications of the Steadfast golf shaft.
Steadfast Golf Shaft Specifications
The main gist about this shaft, the JUPITER ONE PLUS Driver Shaft, is that it’s designed with torque and balance. So it promises the best feeling and the most stable beams on the market.
Steadfast Golf Shaft
$99
The Steadfast golf shaft is reasonably priced at around $100, making it a cost-effective option for golfers.
The shaft boasts innovative features, such as ultra-low torque, which can potentially enhance performance and accuracy.
Suitable for golfers with swing speeds of 95 mph or less, providing them with a good match for their playing style.
At first, the offerings of Steadfast golf shafts sound a little gimmicky because it’s uncommon to find a brand claiming ultra-low torque in their posts.
Before writing this review, I burrowed into reviews on forums and online shopping platforms to see what users say about this shaft.
The reviews have been 50/50, so it’s still a long shot to conclude based solely on the assessment and rating of this shat.
I play a Hazardous Smoke Yellow 60S for context and get along fine with it. But I have still decided to try this out.
The first green light about this product is that Steadfast claims a money-back guarantee, and the shaft is around $100.
So, for the first impression, it’s mixed because I have experience with many promise-and-fail shafts, but this sounded different.
The shaft has a grip and adapter installed, so it has a plug-and-play approach, making it easy for new players.
While I do not like that they use stickers as a label, it even stinks to see that the sticker is too big and crackles as you touch it.
In my opinion, the club would look fairly nice without the sticker or some other paint option.
On the brighter side, the shaft is thicker than normal but oddly thinner in the grip section compared to my hand.
It also felt more flexible without being too whippy.
Club Build
Based on the manufacturer’s recommendation of swing speed, I went with the R flex of the Steadfast Golf shaft.
The range for this flex is quite large—90 to 99 miles per hour, which made me rethink going for a stiff. So this might be a little confusing for new buyers still trying to figure out what shaft flex works best for them.
The advertised weight is 55 grams, which is excellent for pairing with one of my driver heads—the Maltby KE4 Tour TC—at a playing weight of 204 grams.
The Feel
I found out that if I swing very easily, I get a nice tight dispersion—a baby draw or a baby fade—but nothing ridiculous. It was pretty impressive at first, but I had trouble getting this face square as I swung harder.
I suspected it was either lagging or deflecting too far forward and slamming shut. The only logical conclusion I could draw from this outcome is that since I followed Steadfasts’s recommendation and built the driver to 45.5”, the length was probably overwhelming.
Meanwhile, not many driver heads these days are above 200 grams, which is already considered the heavy side, except when you look at models like PING, which can be a couple of grams more. But most drivers are lighter.
The shaft is very flexible in the midsection. I also like that I can feel the shaft load. That’s not to say it’s the only way you can handle the bag, but that’s something for a smooth tempo.
When I swung slowly, the only way that I could get the ball to draw was to release my hands consciously.
How Does It Improve Swing?
The only way I could measure how well it imparted my swing was to pay attention to the data tracked by the Flightscope Mevo + launch monitor.
Initially, I tried to swing at 99 mph or lower to get this regular flex shaft’s lower swing speed range and I was pretty successful at 90 mph.
Here is the data result:
When I stepped it up to my regular swing speed, closer to the upper range of the regular flex of the shaft, I was shooting for 99 mph and could get pretty close swinging on average at 98 mph.
Here is the data result:
So you can see that this is a good-performing shaft. It didn’t jump out with a particularly high or low launch angle or high or low spin. Those are typical for me when testing shafts.
Steadfast Golf Shaft Pros and Cons
Unlike most other shaft reviews I’ve done, it’s going to be challenging to give a rating to the Steadfast golf shafts because the primary purpose of this is to put out enough information about a relatively new and innovative product with the hope that it’ll help others inform their decisions about trying it.
That being said, here are the key pros and cons I jotted down while testing this shaft:
Pros
It’s super affordable.
Innovative technology
It is an ideal option for those who swing at 95 mph or less.
Cons
The swing speed range for the R flex of this shaft is quite broad.
There is not enough visual information from the brand about this shaft and how it works.
The Price
The Steadfast Golf Shaft sells for $99 on Amazon, but on the Steadfast brand’s official website, you can get it for $106. It’s not a bad price point for a quality shaft.
I think it’s a huge benefit, given that they market directly to the consumer and cut out the middleman.
Final Thoughts
Overall, I think the Steadfast golf shaft is worth consideration. Graphite shafts are brittle and do not stand the test of time. But Steadfast is constructed using the highest quality carbon fiber, the pure form of graphite, so you can be assured of more durability and a better overall feel.
However, during my research, I did come across some reviews on possible flaws of this product, especially with the tip prepping or the epoxy that made some heads fly off and adapters come loose.
I didn’t have any issues with this particular shaft spec, but I did a little extra prep and used 24 epoxy to ensure I didn’t encounter any of those issues.
What do you think about the Steadfast golf shaft? Let me know in the comments.
You’ll be able to rock your shoulders like a normal stroke and produce a more fluid movement when using armlock putters because these putters have a longer shaft (usually 40–42 inches long, compared to standard-length putters, which are around 33–36 inches) and a longer grip (between 17 and 21 inches) that is secured against your leading forearm.
However, if you’re considering switching to arm lock putters, there’s one problem. Choosing the right armlock putter for your game can be like finding a needle in a haystack. I tested and reviewed some of the most-loved armlock putters on the market and here are the top five I will recommend in a heartbeat.
Here’s a list of the best arm lock putters worth your consideration and reasons why I recommend them:
If it’s your first time trying armlock putters, I recommend the Odyssey 2-Ball Ten Putter. These putters are impressively forgiving and consistent, so you should improve on the greens if you switch. It’s also the most affordable on the list.
Bettinardi Studio Stock #28 Putter has high-quality construction and a comfortable grip for many more advanced players. The high price tag is also more justifiable if you have skins in the game already.
Want good value for money? You can’t go wrong with the Cobra King 3D-printed Agera Putter. It might lack the feel for purists, but its unique 3D-printed design, affordable price, and forgiveness are worth it.
____________________________________
Different golf enthusiasts have varying views about arm-lock putting; it became especially controversial following Xander Schauffele’s recent comments about this style.
I recently started to mess around with one my younger brother bought—the Odyssey Stroke Labs Double Wide Armlock—which required some getting used to before I became comfortable with it.
Arm-lock putting is a viable option if your concern is stability and consistency on short putts. But the model you pick can make or mar your game improvement.
Before we dive into the full review of our top recommendations, below is a table comparing the best armlock putters across a few relevant factors that can help you make an instant decision in case you’re in a hurry.
Crafted from a single block of soft carbon steel, the Bettinardi Studio Stock #28 Putter delivers an exceptionally soft feel upon impact, thanks to the Tour-preferred Face Impact Technology (FIT) face milling.
The 100% milled construction and proven PGA Tour designs that have won over 70 worldwide since 1998 attest to its quality.
The 17″ Winn Grip feels solid and ensures long-lasting durability. The Bettinardi Studio Stock #28 Armlock Putter earned a 2017 Golf Digest Hot List Gold Medal.
The signature F.I.T. face milling sets this putter apart, offering a consistently smooth roll and valuable feedback with each stroke.
The armlock design stabilizes the putter against your forearm. This gives you enhanced control and accuracy.
This putter is your best bet if you’re an advanced player willing to invest in a high-quality tool.
What I like about this armlock putter
High-quality construction
Comfortable grip
Impressive aesthetics
What I don’t like about this armlock putter
not ideal for beginners.
2. Cobra King 3D-Printed Agera Putter
Cobra King 3D-Printed Agera Putter
$350
Tailored for armlock setup with a 41″ length for a consistent stroke.
SIK aluminum face inserts with Descending Loft Technology (DLT) ensure a consistent launch angle, offering accurate and reliable rolls.
Unique 3D-printed design, and impressive forgiveness.
This putter is tailored for those who prefer an armlock setup, and it comes in a 41″ length, which promotes a consistent stroke.
Allowing the grip and shaft to rest against my lead forearm eliminates variations in shaft angle during my putting stroke.
What sets this putter apart is its multi-material construction.
It features a 3D-printed nylon lattice cartridge, a 291g steel frame, an 18g aluminum cap, and 42g of tungsten on the perimeter, providing exceptional stability for greater consistency.
The 3D-printed nylon cartridge optimizes weight distribution, maximizing the moment of inertia (MOI) for added stability.
The SIK aluminum face inserts with Descending Loft Technology (DLT) ensure a consistent launch angle of 1.5 degrees for every type of putting stroke, offering accurate and reliable rolls.
The visual markers on the putter make alignment a breeze, and each stroke feels clean, reducing those annoying bobbles and bounces on impact with the ball.
My one-putt finishes have increased, especially from the 10-foot range. However, I did encounter a quality control issue with the grip, which was poorly installed, causing the club to sit 20 degrees open at the address.
Despite this hiccup, the Cobra King 3D-printed Agera armlock putter offers stability and consistency to take your putting to the next level.
What I like about this armlock putter
Great value for money
Unique 3D-printed design
Impressively forgiving
What I don’t like about this armlock putter
The look may not be appealing to every golfer.
3. Lab Golf Directed Force 2.1 Armlock Putter
Lab Golf Directed Force 2.1 Armlock Putter
$585
Enhanced stability and “pendulum-like” putting stroke for golfers.
Specialized ArmLock grip for a comfortable and secure hold.
Includes an alignment aid for better-putting precision.
Innovative lie-angle balancing, which keeps the putter head square through the ball without manual adjustments during the stroke.
Head Weight: 370–415 grams, depending on length and lie angle.
Swing Weight: F0-G5, depending on length and lie angle.
Loft: 3.5 degrees of static loft (0.5 degrees of effective loft).
Grip: Armlock Grip
Alignment Aid: #1
LAB Golf has tackled a major issue in putting, the natural rotation of the putter head, with their innovative solution, lie-angle balancing.
Putting is all about getting the right face angle, and it turns out that face angle contributes to nearly 85% of putting success, while putter path accounts for the remaining 15%.
The shorter the putt, the more critical the face angle becomes.
LAB Golf’s answer is their groundbreaking lie-angle balancing, which keeps the putter head square through the ball without manual adjustments during the stroke.
This means a more stable, “pendulum-like” putting stroke for golfers.
With lie-angle balancing, your body’s smaller, less reliable muscle groups relax, allowing your stronger muscles to maintain control over swing speed and path.
The result is improved stability, precise ball direction, and better distance control, leading to more successful putts.
The DF 2.1 ArmLock putter has customization options, including lie angle, length, head weight, and swing weight.
Plus, it features a specialized ArmLock grip and an alignment aid for better-putting precision.
What I like about this armlock putter
Lie-angle balancing
Premium look
What I don’t like about this armlock putter
Expensive
4. Odyssey 2-Ball Ten Putter
Odyssey 2-Ball Ten Putter
$200
Lightweight design, not heavy on the hands.
The 2-Ball model stands out as one of the best made by Odyssey, providing an excellent framing of the ball at address.
Exceptional alignment systems, including 2-Ball and Triple Track options, enhancing alignment for a more accurate putt.
The exceptional alignment systems offered in these putters, including the 2-Ball and Triple Track options, caught my attention immediately. The sleeker and more forgiving head construction enhances the alignment experience. The 2-Ball model, in particular, stood out as the best they’ve ever made, allowing you to frame the ball at an address like never before.
But the improvements don’t stop there. Odyssey has introduced a new version of its tour-proven Stroke Lab shaft. This shaft is lighter, stiffer, and more stable, promoting better tempo and consistency in your putting stroke. I noticed a positive difference in my stroke while using it.
The Microhinge Star Insert in these putters is engineered to provide immediate forward roll for improved speed and control. I could feel the difference as the ball came off the face with the microhinge technology.
What I like about this armlock putter
Easy to align and nice feel
Light, not heavy
Great for beginners
Affordable
What I don’t like about this armlock putter
None so far.
5. Bettinardi Inovai 8.0 Putter
Bettinardi Inovai 8.0 Putter
$400
Fresh and sleek look with a Stealth Black anodized 6061 Military Grade Aluminum body and a Diamond Blast finished 303 Stainless Steel front piece.
Combination of stainless steel in the front piece and military-grade aluminum body for optimized weight distribution and high MOI numbers.
Distinctive alignment lines for improved accuracy.
Ideal for players with a straight back and straight-through putting stroke, emphasizing accuracy and performance on the greens.
I like to think that this putter is a revelation for those seeking accuracy and performance on the greens, as Bettinardi described it as the ideal mallet putter for players with a straight back and straight-through putting stroke.
The 2022 INOVAI Lineup brings a fresh and sleek look thanks to its Stealth Black anodized 6061 Military Grade Aluminum body and a Diamond Blast finished 303 Stainless Steel front piece.
Combining stainless steel in the front piece for that coveted PGA Tour feel and a military-grade aluminum body to optimize weight distribution ensures high MOI numbers.
The Inovai 8.0’s milled face-balanced mallet design offers impressive forgiveness and a unique chrome leading edge.
It is paired with a dark aluminum body and provides distinctive alignment lines.
If you prefer an armlock putter, you’ll be delighted to know that the Bettinardi Inovai 8.0 can be customized to your ideal height.
What I like about this armlock putter
It has a great feel, thanks to the quality milled face.
It’s impressively forgiving.
What I don’t like about this armlock putter
The head of the mallet is somewhat small.
Final Thoughts
If you’re trying armlock putters for the first time, I strongly recommend buying one from a place with a proper putter analysis setup (read: quintic).
I say this because I can recall when I tried an armlock for the first time and got extreme dynamic loft numbers. So, I had to make significant changes to my putter loft for an ideal launch.
But if you’re looking to change your current armlock putter or are familiar with this style, you can make decisions easily.
Most importantly, these recommended armlock putters will best favor you if you struggle with overactive hands during the putting stroke since anchored putting strokes are no longer in the good books of golf.
The Bushnell Launch Pro (BLP) and SkyTrak+ are among the best options for launch monitors under $5,000. For this price range, you can expect them to have their respective pros and cons, making it a tricky pick on the best option.
Fortunately, I’ve owned both the Bushnell Launch Pro and SkyTrak launch monitors and have created this review to compare both devices side-by-side, so you have a clearer picture of what both options offer and which is worth your money.
SkyTrak shines by providing weather settings, portability, side-angle readings, wireless setup, and photometric readings. But Bushnell Launch Pro gains more love because it’s easy to set up, includes one free year of the basic software package, provides in-depth shot and club data, houses up to 10 simulated courses, and is enabled by wireless internet.
Both devices are great, honestly. If you’re a recreational golfer, the differences between these devices may not be a deal-breaker. But again, the last thing you want is to make a careless purchase and later realize that one would have better served you than the other.
So, in the rest of this article, I’ll walk you through the features, specifications, performance, accuracy, design, and overall performance of both Bushnell Launch Pro and SkyTrak launch monitors.
Bushnell Launch Pro vs. SkyTrak Comparison Chart
Before we dive into the head-to-head review, here’s a rundown of how both devices measure up across relevant factors. It will help you make quicker decisions on which is better for you if you’re in a hurry.
Factors
Bushnell Launch Pro
SkyTrak+
Data Metrics
Ball Data (Carry Distance) Ball Speed, Vertical Launch Angle, Horizontal Launch Angle, Spin Axis, Backspin, and Sidespin) as well as Club Data (Club Speed, Club Path, Angle of Attack, and Smash Factor)
Ball Data (Ball Speed, Launch Angle (vertical), Descent Angle, Backspin, Sidespin, Side Angle (horizontal launch angle), Max Height, and Carry Distance) as well as Club Data (Club Speed, Club Path, Face to Path, Face to Target, and Smash Factor)
Ball Data (Carry Distance) Ball Speed, Vertical Launch Angle, Horizontal Launch Angle, Spin Axis, Backspin, and Sidespin) as well as Club Data (Club Speed, Club Path, Angle of Attack, and Smash Factor)
Ball Data (Ball Speed, Launch Angle (vertical), Descent Angle, Backspin, Sidespin, Side Angle (horizontal launch angle), Max Height, and Carry Distance) as well as Club Data (Club Speed, Club Path, Face to Path, Face to Target, and Smash Factor)
Both devices give you ball and club data. I figured this is the area where most people are interested. So, instead of listing off everything that both devices offer, we will focus on what they don’t provide.
For example, the Skytrak+ has the ball and club data you’d expect from a typical launch monitor, but it’s missing the angle of attack.
I’ve tried to think of why this is so, but the closest conclusion I came to was that it probably has to do with the angle of the radiator that measures it.
On the other hand, Bushnell Launch Pro has the angle of attack metric but lacks face angle data such as face-to-target or face-to-club path.
Hitting Area
The Bushnell Launch Pro has a hitting area of 7” by 10”, which is pretty much right in the middle of most hitting strips you will use in a golf simulator.
The device uses the display on the screen to show you the shape of the hitting area. When you drop a golf ball, it shows you where it is on the screen. So, you can adjust if you’re a bit far forward with the ball.
It has an edge over SkyTrak because it makes the BLP fast, efficient, and easy to use.
On the part of SkyTrak, the hitting area is not an area. It’s just a red dot on the ground where you’re supposed to place the golf ball that works just like the original Skytrak, but the Skytrak+ is 40cm larger in area.
Shot Delays
While using both launch monitors, I noticed a little delay between when I hit the shot and when it appeared on screen for the SkyTrak. This is a unique feature of the Skytrak that’s not present on the Bushnell Launch Pro.
Indoor and outdoor performance
Skytrak+ does work indoors and outdoors, which gives it an edge over the original Skytrak, but you still need a map when using the device outdoors, so you cannot take it to a golf course. If you’re at a grass-driving range, it won’t work either.
On the other hand, the Bushnell Launch Pro works great indoors as a golf simulator or outdoors at the driving range or golf course.
Since it has a built-in display, it can be used as a standalone device if you don’t want to use any apps or other devices.
Software for the Driving Range
The Bushnell Launch Pro software has three main pieces from Foresight. Each one has a driving range.
The FSX Pro is Bushnell’s PC or iPad app. It gives you all the necessary data, but not necessarily as a simulation would. It can serve as your driving range, especially if you’re not using a PC.
The FSX 2020: This subscription was dedicated to the Launch Pro device. It is identical to the regular Foresight FSX 2020 but just made to verify the subscription with the Launch Pro. Apart from having all the basic features, you can integrate swing cameras, which is awesome.
The FSX Play: This is Bushnell’s newest simulation software. It has a driving range similar to the FSX 2020 but has fewer features. There are no swing cameras and fewer settings or customization options.
NOTE: Depending on subscriptions, some of these features may be locked for you in FSX Pro.
For the SkyTrak software, you get the SkyTrak app with its driving range. I also like that it allows for many settings and customization options, such as how far the ball flies and creating targets of different sizes and distances.
The software has a cool feature called a randomizer that picks a different yardage for you and mixes it up so you’re not just hitting the same target repeatedly.
On the software, you can click on each data point for an elaborate explanation of what the metric means and pop a video of what the data means. So, SkyTrak is so cool for game improvement.
Price and value
The Skytrak costs $2,995 while the Bushnell Launch Pro costs $3,499, but one thing to mention is that the Bushnell Launch Pro goes on sale frequently throughout the year and around holidays; it can usually go on sale for $500 off, so that would make them the same price as the Skytrak.
Also, you can pick up a used or refurbished Bushnell Launch Pro from eBay for around $3000.
Pros and cons
Indeed, there are no perfect launch monitors out there. There are always two sides to the coin. To further help you decide which of these launch monitors is best for you, consider the pros and cons of each:
Bushnell Launch Pro
PROS
CONS
It comes with an alignment stick and is very easy to set up.
The software packages are pricey compared to SkyTrak’s.
Connects wirelessly to your internet.
Only ten simulated courses were offered, despite the high price.
The accuracy for indoors and outdoors is reliable.
An extra fee is charged to access advanced shot/ball metrics like side spin, backspin, spin tilt axis, club path, and angle of attack.
The graphs make it easier to understand my swings and other insights.
SkyTrak’s battery life is better than the Bushnell Launch Pro’s.
For the price, the accuracy even challenges launch monitors that cost more.
It can take between 5 and 7 seconds to pull up shout metrics.
Reliable wireless connection.
It doesn’t provide as many shot metrics as the Bushnell Launch Pro.
The simulated renderings of famous courses look cool.
Ability to archive and review shot data later on.
The device itself is relatively affordable compared to the Bushnell Lauch Pro.
Verdict summary
All the time I used both launch monitors, Bushnell seems to be the more accurate (slightly) but the limitations of significant membership prices and only ten base courses are tough to swallow.
On the other hand, even if you don’t know much about SkyTrak, their reviews always look good from real users. So that’s a good side.
That being said, here’s my final rating based on the experiences I had with both devices:
Rating
Bushnell Launch Pro
SkyTrak Launch Monitor
Metrics captured
9
8
Accuracy
10
8.5
Performance
8
7
Ease of Use
10
8
Looks
9
8.5
TOTAL (50 points):
46 Points
40 Points
Overall, despite the fact that it costs a little more, I will pick the Bushnell Launch Pro over the SkyTrak anytime, any day.
I love its 3-camera system, reliable Foresight technology, which PGA Tour Pros also use, similar accuracy to the Foresight GCQuad, indoor and outdoor reliability, and even the unit display.
However, this doesn’t mean it’s the best choice for you.
You can’t go wrong with SkyTrak if you’re on a tight budget. It’s even a smarter option if you want to use it indoors with an iPad only and you live outside the U.S. (At the time of writing, Launch Pro is only sold and can only be used within the U.S.)
Bushnell Tour V4 and Callaway 300 Pro are powerful rangefinders that get lots of love from golf communities. They both allow for automatic and accurate slope compensation and are identical in features. This explains why it’s difficult for many buyers to pick between these two options.
I decided to try these two rangefinders side-by-side, and the first discovery from my comparison test is that the Callaway 300 Pro is less accurate for longer distances, but the Bushnell is only more accurate by 100 yards. But many people would not consider this a big deal considering the lower price of the Callaway 300 Pro, its scan targeting feature, and a superior lens make it a steal for $200.
I’ve been a loyal fan of the Leupold RX 600 range finder but had to replace it with a slope-equipped rangefinder. During my search, I discovered many people are in the dilemma of flipping between the Bushnell Tour V4 Shift and the Callaway 300 Pro. I decided to cut out a budget to experience these models individually.
The first impression was the price difference. The Bushnell is twice the price of the Callaway, but is it worth the extra cost? I have documented my experience in comparison with these two devices to help you decide which is better for you.
Bushnell vs. Callaway Rangefinder: Compared
Before we delve into the full comparison, below is a table comparing both rangefinders across relevant factors:
Factors
Bushnell Tour V4
Callaway 300 Pro
Dimension
2.61 L x 1.33″ W x 1.97″ H
4″L x 2.7″W x 1.4″H
Weight
0.75 Pounds
0.5 Pounds
Slope Function
Yes
Yes
Magnification
x5
x6
Range
1,000 yards and 400+ yards to a flag within one yard
The Bushnell Tour V4 rangefinder features PinSeeker technology with Jolt, which delivers short vibrating bursts to confirm that the laser has locked onto the flag.
It’s incredibly precise, accurately ranging from 5 to 1,000 yards and pinpointing the flag within one yard, even at 400+ yards.
The 5x magnification and fast focus system ensure a clear view of my shot. But it is nothing compared to a 6-x-powered rangefinder.
One standout feature is the patented slope technology, which calculates the compensated distance based on the hole’s incline or decline, giving me a more accurate target reading. The compact size of the Tour V4 is a notable improvement, and it swiftly acquires targets.
On the other hand, the Callaway 300 Pro offers 6x magnification, providing a range of 5-1000 yards with an impressive +/- 1-yard accuracy.
It also offers measurements in yards and meters, catering to everyone’s preferences. The Pin-Locking Technology, with Pin Acquisition Technology (P.A.T.), allows you to lock onto a pin up to 300 yards away.
Plus, there’s a nifty pulse confirmation—a short vibrating “burst” lets you know when you’ve locked onto the pin accurately.
The External Slope On/Off Switch is great for tournament play, ensuring it complies with the rules.
The premium molded hard carry case with a carabiner and elastic “quick-close” band adds to the overall value.
However, if you wear glasses, you might find it tricky to get your eye close enough to see all the data at once.
You’ll need to adjust the device to find the right angle.
The effective distance with a slope enabled appears in the bottom corner, and the vibration feedback is clear.
Accuracy
When it comes to accuracy, both rangefinders are great. They give similar results, and the slope adjustment efficiency of both devices is identical.
However, during testing, I noticed that the Bushnell V4 targeted flags from a further distance, and I had trouble locking onto pins farther than 300 yards when using the Callaway 300 Pro.
Meanwhile, the Callaway 300 has a more powerful lens with 6x magnification, even though it’s not as accurate as the Bushnell Tour V4.
I also like that the Callaway has a scan mode that simultaneously brings up distances to multiple targets. This gives it an edge over Bushnell.
Price
If you’re on a tight budget, the Callaway 300 Pro would appeal more to you because it’s half the price of the Bushnell V4.
The area of price is where these two devices vary widely. With $200, you can get the Callaway 300, but you need $400 to purchase the Bushnell V4.
Battery
The Bushnell V4 has a battery that runs off a 3-volt battery that comes with a casing. While testing this device, the batter held up for full 18-hole rounds.
The Callaway 300 Pro is operated by a single 3-volt battery that holds up for close to two and a half 18-hole rounds.
While the Callaway comes with appealing accessories like the lanyard strap, cleaning cloth, and carrying case, the Bushnell battery has a longer life than the Callaway.
Pros and cons
Indeed, there’s no perfect product out there. There are always two sides to the coin. To further help you decide which of these launch monitors is best for you, consider the pros and cons of each:
Bushnell Tour V4 Rangefinder
PROS
CONS
Can measure distance to pins up to 400 yards
5x magnification compared to Callaway 300 Pro’s 6x magnification
However, depending on your needs and budget, one will be a better choice.
With these in mind, here’s my rating for both devices based on my experience with them:
Rating
Bushnell Tour V4
Callaway 300 Pro
Optics
10
8
Accuracy
9
9
Performance
8
9.5
Ease of Use
10
9
Looks
10
7
TOTAL (50 points):
47 Points
42.5 Points
The Callaway 300 is a bang for a buck. But it’s less accurate for longer distances. So, if you value accuracy, especially for game improvement, the Bushnell V4 is a better buy, but remember, it’s only more accurate by 100 yards.
If you value the scan targeting feature and affordability, you can overlook this accuracy gap and proceed with the call.
The best slip-on golf shoes offer excellent traction, stability, and support to enhance your golf swing. You also want to prioritize waterproofing or resistance features to keep your feet dry in various weather conditions. I have tested dozens of golf shoes and have been able to reach the top five slip-on styles that performed above expectations:
Here’s a list of the best slip-on golf shoes and why I recommend them:
I recommend both male and female versions of the Skechers Go Golf Elite 5 for its Hands-Free Slip-insTM for an easy fit. It also has an exclusive Heel PillowTM that holds your foot securely in place, making it the top choice in this review.
The Go Golf Elite 4 Course Relaxed from Skechers would be ideal if you’re on a tight budget and a male player.
Female golf players will benefit a lot from PUMA Tustin Slip-on Golf Shoes.
FootJoy Leisure Slip-on Spikeless Golf Shoes are the most affordable for female players on a tight budget.
________________________________
As a golfer with wide feet, I’ve spent most of my years as a Footjoy and New Balance guy since they offer extra wide sizes. However, I decided to try the slip-on style when I began to detest wearing sneakers in the summer because my feet got sweaty.
Over time, I have tried different brands and models and reviewed five of the best options that performed impressively.
I have also included the ones that work well for female golf players. Below is a table showing a rundown of the comparison between these top recommendations.
If you’re a senior golfer, you’ll agree that bending over to tie laces is not fun, but these slip-ins are a lifesaver.
They feature Skechers’ Hands-Free Slip-insTM technology and the exclusive Heel PillowTM, ensuring a secure fit without the hassle of laces.
The Twist FitTM closure allows for a precise and adjustable fit. The Arch Fit® insole provides podiatrist-certified support and molds to your foot, reducing shock and increasing comfort.
These waterproof shoes are perfect for fall, offering stability and breathability.
The GRIPFLEX spikeless outsole delivers superior traction.
After several rounds of golf, I can confidently say these shoes are lightweight, comfortable, and a fantastic choice for any golfer. It has a version for women golfers that costs about the same amount.
What I like about this shoe
Skechers Hands-Free Slip-insTM for an easy fit
The Exclusive Heel PillowTM holds your foot securely in place.
Twist FitTM dial closure for an adjustable, precise fit
What I don’t like about this shoe
None so far.
2. Adidas Codechaos Boa
Adidas Codechaos Boa
$98 to $199
Made with 50% recycled plastics for a waterproof and breathable upper.
Unique zip-up closure with an adjustable dial system for a comfortable and secure fit.
Waterproof film on the mesh upper keeps feet dry in light to moderate rain.
User-friendly Boa tightening knob for even shoe distribution.
The Adidas Codechaos Boa golf shoes have a unique twist on traditional slip-ons with their zip-up closure and adjustable dial system.
Despite the unconventional design, these shoes excel in wet weather conditions thanks to their exceptional traction.
Adidas used 50% recycled plastics to create the Codechaos Boa, crafting a waterproof, breathable upper with fantastic traction. The spikeless outsole features Twist Grip traction and a sidewall wrap for top-notch stability.
The mesh upper is equipped with a waterproof film, keeping my feet dry even in light to moderate rain.
The Boost Midsole effectively absorbed impact, offering excellent comfort and reducing vibrations during each step and swing.
These shoes are perfect for golfers seeking superior grip and wet-weather protection.
They fit well, and the line-tightening knob is user-friendly, ensuring even distribution in the shoe. The zip closure adds a stylish touch, and they feel incredibly comfortable, like walking on clouds.
In my opinion, you can’t go wrong with these.
What I like about this shoe
This shoe is easy to slip into.
The Boa tightness knob is easy to use and makes for a firm, comfortable fit.
waterproof and easy to clean when playing on wet courses
What I don’t like about this shoe
Not everyone will like the dial-fit system and zip-closure.
Skechers Go Golf Elite 4 Course Relaxed stands out because of its affordability, comfort, and impressive traction.
These canvas shoes are incredibly convenient with their slip-on design and are lightweight, cushioned, and breathable.
I particularly appreciated the spacious front structure, but the real highlight is the Ultra Go cushioning. It’s soft and responsive, ensuring a comfortable landing with every step.
The Goga Max High-Rebound Insole enhances comfort and responsiveness, making each stride pleasant.
However, the spineless rubber traction pad works well in dry conditions but loses grip in wet weather.
These shoes are perfect for golfers in warmer climates, offering breathability and superb grip in drier conditions.
If your golf course has steep hills, consider lace-up models. My relatively flat course works well with these.
What I like about this shoe
A durable rubber traction pad provides adequate grip in dry and light rain.
Water repellant top
Responsive Ultra-Go cushioning
A high rebound insole absorbs shocks.
What I don’t like about this shoe
Aesthetics are dull for players who like to make a statement.
4. PUMA Tustin Slip-on Golf Shoes
PUMA Tustin Slip-on Golf Shoes
$62 to $72
Low-top design for added convenience.
True-to-size fit, providing reliability in various sizes.
“Hidden Traction” outsole offers necessary grip without being obtrusive.
Microfiber material and rubber sole for comfort and performance.
These spikeless golf shoes feature a sleek design with a rubber sole and microfiber material, offering comfort and performance.
What I appreciate most about these shoes is their true-to-size fit, making them a reliable choice in various sizes.
The low-top design adds to their convenience.
Moreover, the molded comfort insole ensures an excellent fit, making them comfortable for an entire round of golf. The “Hidden Traction” outsole provides the necessary grip without being obtrusive.
These PUMA slip-on golf shoes combine style, convenience, traction, and stability at an affordable price.
I prefer uncomplicated golf shoes, and these would be perfect for any female golf player with similar taste.
You can wear them for 18 holes and practice at the driving range, experiencing comfort throughout your entire game.
What I like about this shoe
True to size
Comfortable to wear without having to change into another pair to go to the 19th hole
Simple design
Multiple color options
What I don’t like about this shoe
The inner sole is hard to maintain from dirt due to the color.
5. FootJoy Leisure Slip on Spikeless
FootJoy Leisure Slip on Spikeless
$24 – $56
Lightweight cushioning underfoot with EVA (Ethyl Vinyl Acetate) fit-beds.
One-year waterproof protection for comfort, breathability, and durability.
Unique design with laces that are easy to slip on and off.
Wider toe bed for enhanced comfort and the option to use orthotics.
The FootJoy Women’s Leisure Slip-On Spikeless golf shoes from last season are quite pleasing, especially for the price point.
FootJoy is a well-respected golf apparel brand. This pair, in particular, has laces, but the unique design makes them easy to slip on and off.
The wider toe bed is perfect for comfort; you’ll even have space for your orthotics.
However, the long laces can be a bit of a hassle.
These shoes provide excellent traction with a proprietary rubber outsole and one-year waterproof protection, but they’re not the best choice for hot summer days.
What I like about this shoe
Super affordable
They give you two colors for laces, which is nice.
EVA (Ethyl Vinyl Acetate) fit-beds provide lightweight cushioning underfoot.
One year of waterproof comfort, breathability, and durability
What I don’t like about this shoe
It’s not the best breathable pair for hot summer golf. It works best for cooler-weather golf shoes.
Final Words
Slip-on shoes may not have the best water protection construction like traditional golf shoes, but they come in handy when running late for your tee time.
These types of shoes are super convenient.
I ensured the products I ranked for this review were only quality, with a proven record of stopping wrecks at the shoe’s heel.
The best part is that they are budget-friendly, so you don’t have to break the bank to get comfortable slip-on shoes for your golf games.
The golf ball pick-up tool for a putter should be durable, lightweight, and easy to attach to the putter grip.
When searching for one, I look for an option with a non-obtrusive design, simple to use without bending or stooping, and possibly magnetic or suction-based for convenience.
After extensive research, testing, and comparison, here are the five options that have proven to be the best:
The nickel putter ball pick-up is an all-around tool for any situation. It fits any golf putter grip, and no drilling is allowed. However, it’s the most expensive on this list but worth the cost.
I strongly recommend the Club Champ Sports Rubber Ball Pick-Up if you’re on a tight budget. It also has a magnet that makes retrieving balls easier.
The NUOBESTY Suction Cup Grabber is a smart option if you want the grip style to be suction-oriented instead of clawing.
No matter your choice, you won’t be spending more than $20 on a quality golf ball pick-up tool here.
____________________________________
After completing my outdoor simulator setup, collecting balls from the ground by hand became annoying. I’m used to the golf net indoors bringing them to me after every shot.
While searching for a solution, I looked at a few Amazon options, and most of the ball pick-up tools listed didn’t look smart. I scanned the reviews of multiple products before settling for the Nickel Putter Ball Pick-Up on the PGA superstore.
But the truth is that there are a few quality options out there, and I’m happy to have found some impressive ones. In case you’re in a hurry, I have compared these top recommendations in the table below:
This ingeniously designed device is a fantastic solution for golfers looking to save their backs from constantly bending over to pick up golf balls.
It’s light years ahead of those frustrating suction cup pick-ups.
The Nickel Putter Ball Pick-up effortlessly attaches to any golf putter grip without drilling or complicated installation.
It makes the ball discreet and practically invisible, so you won’t even notice it’s there. And the best part? It works like a charm. No more struggles with rubber cups that either fall off or can’t pick up the ball.
Using synthetic materials ensures that it’s highly durable, and for me, it’s worth every extra penny.
If you’re a senior golfer dealing with the onset of back problems, this little gadget will easily become a lifesaver. It will allow you to stand upright and balanced while effortlessly retrieving your ball from the hole.
It’s a small investment for a significant improvement in the golfing experience.
What I like about this pick-up tool
It fits any golf putter. Grip
No more bending over to retrieve the ball.
Attaches easily with no drilling required.
Simple to use
Synthetic materials for high durability
Discreet—you won’t even know there
What I don’t like about this pick-up tool
The flip top opens easily when taking the putter out of the bag.
Relatively expensive
2. Club Champ Sports Rubber Ball Pick-Up Tool
Club Champ Sports Rubber Ball Pick-Up
$7
Durable rubber construction.
Easily fits over the putter grip.
Integrated design with the putter grip for a snug fit.
The highlight for me on this Club Champ Sports rubber ball pickup tool is how well it fits over my putter grip, specifically my Winn VSN grip.
To make it fit snugly, I soaked the ball pick-up in hot water for two minutes and then firmly slipped it onto the grip until it bottomed out.
It stays securely in place and has a squared-off shape that neatly integrates with the end of my grip.
What’s convenient is that you can keep my favorite putting ball in this tool, ensuring it’s always within reach when you step onto the green to putt.
The plastic claws grip the ball tightly, so I don’t have to worry about it getting lost.
As an unexpected bonus, when I pick up my course ball and place it in the pick-up tool before a putt, I can use it against my body to stabilize my putting stroke effectively.
It’s like having an extra pair of hands to steady my game.
This fantastic tool comes at a great price, making it a valuable addition to your golf gear. The only minor drawback is that it doesn’t allow my putter to fit in my golf bag due to the bag’s design.
What I like about this pick-up tool
Affordable
Pick up your ball without bending over.
Durable rubber
Fits over your putter grip
What I don’t like about this pick-up tool
It works well, but it is huge. It may or may not fit in your golf bag when it’s on your putter.
3. Nuobesty Suction Cup Grabber
Nuobesty Suction Cup Grabber
$9
Crafted from high-quality PVC for durability and longevity.
Suitable for most putter grips with a diameter of 1.77 inches (4.5cm).
Particularly beneficial for individuals with disabilities, making ball retrieval effortless and reducing the need for bending.
This ball grabber is crafted from high-quality PVC and is incredibly durable and long-lasting. Not to mention, it’s conveniently lightweight and easy to carry around.
The added magnet inside the grabber is a brilliant feature, as it effortlessly attaches to the end of the putter grip.
The vibrant red color and the combination of rubber and PVC materials give it a pleasing look and feel.
With a diameter of 1.77 inches (4.5cm), it’s a good fit for most putter grips.
While this grabber effectively picks up the ball as intended and is easy to use, I did encounter a minor issue with it slipping off my midsized putter grip when I pulled it out of my bag.
So, I’d recommend it primarily for those with round putter grips.
That said, the pick-up tool will tremendously help people with disabilities. Bending to retrieve a ball from the cup, which used to be a challenge, will become a breeze.
You will no longer have to strain yourself, especially during mini-putt games.
What I like about this pick-up tool
The red color makes it stand out.
Lightweight and handy to carry.
The magnet inside easily attaches to the end of a putter grip.
What I don’t like about this pick-up tool
None so far.
4. Maxfli Golf Ball Pick-Up
Maxfli Golf Ball Pick-Up
$12
Features a fixed 3-prong design that securely grabs the golf ball from the hole.
Durable plastic construction for long-lasting convenience.
Easy attachment to the end of a standard putter grip for effortless ball retrieval.
This nifty device attaches easily to the end of your standard putter grip, making ball retrieval a breeze.
The fixed 3-prong design securely grabs your golf ball from the hole. It’s durably constructed, ensuring long-lasting convenience.
I’ve experimented with a few other ball retrievers, including a large suction cup that often got stuck in my bag and a small suction cup that didn’t seal properly when dirty.
The Maxfli tool, however, screws into the putter end and consistently grabs the ball without any issues.
The only downside is that it won’t work with Superstroke or Odyssey putters.
What I like about this pick-up tool
Grab a golf ball without bending.
A fixed 3-prong design grabs your golf ball from the hole.
Durable plastic construction
What I don’t like about this pick-up tool
It doesn’t seem to work with Superstroke or Odyssey putters.
5. SisterAling 3-Prong Golf Ball Retriever
SisterAling 3-Prong Golf Ball Retriever
$7
Versatile – can be repurposed for picking up table tennis balls.
A great gift idea for fellow golfers.
Features a three-claw design made of durable plastic for quick and accurate ball retrieval.
This ergonomic golf ball teeing device is designed to save golfers from bending over to retrieve their balls, significantly reducing back stress.
The three-claw design made of durable plastic allows for quick and accurate ball retrieval.
While it may not fit as snugly in a club handle as a dedicated stick, attaching it to a broken club shaft or lightweight bamboo/dowel rod works like a charm.
It’s flexible yet sturdy, and I’m confident this option will serve you and stand the test of time.
You can even repurpose it for picking up table tennis balls.
What I like about this pick-up tool
High quality
Upgraded claw design
Portable design
Great gift idea
What I don’t like about this pick-up tool
None so far.
Wrapping Up: How to Choose the Best Golf Ball Pick-Up Tool
When shopping for a golf ball pick-up tool for your putter, first confirm that the product is compatible with your putter’s grip size and design. Some pick-up tools are designed to fit specific putters.
Look for a tool that is easy to use, allowing you to pick up golf balls without bending over excessively. The device should securely hold the golf ball, preventing it from falling off during use. The product reviewed in this article has a magnet but also uses suction and a 3-prong gripping mechanism.
Also, think about the price. Golf ball pick-up tools are generally affordable. But still, set a budget and find an agency that offers good value for the price.
The Garmin R10 and Flightscope Mevo Plus are among the market’s most talked-about launch monitors.
If you’re torn between both models, the good news is that there’s no bad decision. These two devices have proven to be reliable.
But one will surely be more suitable for your needs than the other.
The major selling point of the Mevo+ is the Wi-Fi hotspot, internal alignment camera, 17 practice ranges, five simulated courses, and lots of shot data. On the other hand, the Garmin R10 flourishes in archives club stats, being a driving range simulator, smartphone compatible, 10-hour battery life, waterproof, and rechargeable battery.
I have had the Mevo Plus for a few months now and realized it’s a much better choice for scratch players and those who regularly compete in tournaments.
The R10 appeared to be a better choice for a solid launch monitor at an affordable price.
But other relevant performance factors lead to this conclusion, which I have detailed in the rest of this article.
To begin with, I have created the table below to give a rundown of what sets the R10 and Mevo Plus apart to help you make a decision:
Club Head Speed, Club Face Angle, Club Path Angle, Angle of Attack, Ball Speed, Launch Angle, Launch Direction, Spin Axis, Spin Rate, Apex Height, Smash Factor, Carry Distance, Total Distance, and Deviation Distance
Existing Mevo data in addition to Horizontal Launch Angle, Lateral Landing, Angle of Attack, Total Distance, Roll Distance, Spin Axis, Spin Loft, and Shot Shape (20 in total)
Club Head Speed, Club Face Angle, Club Path Angle, Angle of Attack, Ball Speed, Launch Angle, Launch Direction, Spin Axis, Spin Rate, Apex Height, Smash Factor, Carry Distance, Total Distance, and Deviation Distance
Existing Mevo data in addition to Horizontal Launch Angle, Lateral Landing, Angle of Attack, Total Distance, Roll Distance, Spin Axis, Spin Loft, and Shot Shape (20 in total)
It’s cool that each device has its own dedicated app, and, to be fair, both are very good.
However, after using the R10 for a while, I noticed that it’s more user-friendly, especially for someone breaking into the world of launch simulators.
The way data is presented on the Garmin Golf App is easy to understand, but I can’t say the same for experience when it comes to making comparisons and digging into numbers.
The FS Golf app seems to do it better. Many users have also reported difficulty connecting the Garmin Golf App with the iPad.
I didn’t experience this issue, but it bears mentioning.
The app offering of the FlightScope Mevo+ makes it feel professional. When you track with the Mevo+, it feels like you’re using a higher-end device like Trackman.
The experience is similar.
Data Metrics
The data metrics offered by both devices are satisfactory.
The Garmin R10 doesn’t offer as many metrics as the Mevo+, and I didn’t expect it to.
But for its price range, it’s impressive that we can enjoy metrics like Face to Path or Club Path that are only included in the Pro Package with the Mevo Plus.
Here’s a full image of what the Garmin R10 launch monitor offers:
With the Flightscope Mevo+, you get 16 data sets, but you can upgrade to the Mevo+ Pro Package for an extra $1,000 to get 11 different metrics.
This is a steal because it is affordable compared to getting the total package in a launch monitor that costs thousands of dollars.
Here’s a full image of what the Flightscope Mevo + launch monitor offers:
Regarding who offers more data metrics, Mevo+ is undoubtedly spot on.
If you’re concerned with game improvement while shopping for launch monitors, this is the green light at the Mevo+.
Performance
Regarding performance, it’s easy to conclude that both devices have a tie because they equally come with a mobile subscription to the e6 Simulator software, a well-known simulator option on the market.
P.S.: You can’t connect the software to your PC or projector. It’s simply mobile subscription-based.
It is worth noting that the R10 doesn’t track putts, whereas the Mevo+ will.
The performance of the FlightScope Mevo+ and the Garmin R10 indoors is decent, but the Mevo+ has an edge for indoor use since it allows you to use an AC wall adapter for continuous power.
The Garmin R10 doesn’t have this feature, but it compensates for its long-lasting battery life, which is up to 10 hours—seven hours more than the Flightscope.
Ease of Use
The Garmin R10 is Bluetooth-based, and the FlightScope Mevo+ has a Wi-Fi network to connect to. So, both are easy to use with their respective connection modules.
However, some people using iPads with no cellular data plan usually experience data issues with the Mevo Plus.
Since the R10 gets everything done within the Garmin golf app, it is easy to use. If you’re familiar with the Garmin ecosystem, using the R10 won’t be an issue.
Using Garmin is easier. The physical design allows for a simple plug-and-play. If you don’t like professional-level devices, the FS Mevo+ will look cumbersome to use.
The many options on the app can be a good thing but ironically, they turn out to be a not-so-great offering.
Meanwhile, for ease of usage, the Mevo+ requires 16 feet of space (8 feet behind the ball and 8 feet in front), while the R10 needs 8 feet in front of the ball but only seven behind.
In other words, both devices have similar space limitations.
But the Mevo+ gave me more accurate readings when I moved it closer behind me.
Accuracy
Regarding accuracy, I wasn’t surprised to discover how the Mevo+ outranked the Garmin. It’s an expensive device, so I can only expect a lot.
In all fairness, both devices are accurate for what they are.
The difference in accuracy and performance between these two devices would probably not mean much if you’re an amateur golfer looking for some help in your practice sessions or for a fun garage simulator setup.
To put things in perspective, only two in ten shots were misread while using the Garmin R10, which is interpreted as 80% accuracy.
That’s not bad for a launch monitor below a thousand dollars. Plus, it’s easier and more accurate to use straight out of the box than the Mevo+.
But the Mevo+ has superior accuracy that pro golfers will value.
If you’re coming down from the Bushnell Lauch Pro or Trackman, you’d want to stick to the likes of Mevo+ because they offer close accuracy experience.
Overall, the lie and loft angle of the device will determine its accuracy.
Some people who have reviewed these two devices say Garmin is more accurate, and I can only imagine it’s due to weather and elevation settings, the type of ball, and other relevant factors that influence the accuracy of launch monitors apart from the device itself.
Pros and cons
Indeed, there’s no perfect product out there.
There are always two sides to the coin. To further help you decide which of these launch monitors is best for you, consider the pros and cons of each:
Garmin Approach R10
What I like
What I don’t like
It’s a great value for the money.
It loses connection outdoors easily.
Easy to set up and use. Also very portable
It can take a few swings of trial and error to get it at the angle where the horizontal misses and correct it.
It allows you to save data from your practice sessions to view at any time.
The launch direction accuracy was consistently off by at least 4 degrees.
It is an affordable but reliable launch monitor.
It would be better if slow motion were added to the video capabilities.
Stronger battery life that lasts up to 10 hours
You need to pay for a subscription to use the Home Tee Hero mode.
Flightscope Mevo Plus
What I like
What I don’t like
It’s game-improvement-oriented
more expensive than the R10
Onboard Wi-Fi hotspot for a stronger connection
Short-game accuracy is not so great.
Stress-free alignment process
Not as fast as the R10 when registering shot readings
It works great for outdoor
Lagging performance indoors
The shot data is impressive.
Not as portable as the R10
Verdict summary
Both the Garmin R10 and Mevo Plus are great devices.
I like the built-in stand of the Mevo Plus. The overall construction quality of the device feels more “pro level” than any of the other launch monitors under $2,000 I’ve used.
The Garmin R10 itself is also impressive.
To conclude, I had to observe their performance on portability and battery, setup, primary app, user experience, data points, accuracy, indoor and outdoor use, and even battery life.
With these in mind, here’s my rating for both devices based on my experience with them:
Rating
Garmin Approach R10
Mevo Plus
Metrics provided
7.5
10
Accuracy
7.0
10
Performance
8.5
9.5
Ease of Use
10
8
Looks
8.0
9.5
TOTAL (50 points):
41 points
47 points
In this comparison review, the Flightscope Mevo Plus launch monitor wins over the Garmin Approach R10.
If you’re on a tight budget, the Garmin R10 is a more feasible option, and you won’t regret purchasing it. But I think the Flightscope Mevo Plus is a better launch monitor because it offers more.
From the software quality to the data points offered and accuracy, the Mevo Plus is just great overall.
You will only have to pay significantly more for it.
The Garmin Approach R10 is a handy and affordable little launch monitor you can take anywhere, while the Skytrak is a higher-end golf launch monitor. Still, it’s pretty much the opposite of the Garmin Approach R10. I tested both devices and will show you in this article how they measure up against each other.
After multiple tests, the Garmin R10 proved to be a better option for taking swing videos, while SkyTrack stands tall for tracking swing data. Meanwhile, both devices do not measure club paths, which you can get on higher-end launch monitors. The SkyTrak struggles to work at its best outdoors but works better than the Garmin indoors. Still, the features of both devices overlap, and if one is better than the other, it’s only with a little margin (aside from the price difference, of course).
I became more interested in placing these two devices head-to-head after watching how David Maxfield Golf, in a video, compared the Flightscope Mevo Plus to the Garmin R10, and both units tracked the shots simultaneously and were identical with every hit. So what about someone willing to spend a few extra hundred dollars for something better? Is the Skytrak launch monitor worth it?
You will find out in this full review. In case you’re in a hurry, I have created the table below to give a rundown of what sets the R10 and Skytrack apart to help you make a decision:
Garmin R10 vs. Skytrack: Comparison Chart
The Skytrak shines in the area’s weather settings and the fact that it works by photometric readings. The wireless setup is also a huge plus. But the Garmin Approach R10 also has robust offerings, from archives club stats and a driving range simulator to smartphone compatibility and 10-hour battery life.
Club Head Speed, Club Face Angle, Club Path Angle, Angle of Attack, Ball Speed, Launch Angle, Launch Direction, Spin Axis, Spin Rate, Apex Height, Smash Factor, Carry Distance, Total Distance, and Deviation Distance
Ball speed, launch angle, back and side spin, side angle, carry distance, roll, total distance, club head speed, angle of decent, distance offline, a 3D flightpath with apex height and hang time
Club Head Speed, Club Face Angle, Club Path Angle, Angle of Attack, Ball Speed, Launch Angle, Launch Direction, Spin Axis, Spin Rate, Apex Height, Smash Factor, Carry Distance, Total Distance, and Deviation Distance
Ball speed, launch angle, back and side spin, side angle, carry distance, roll, total distance, club head speed, angle of decent, distance offline, a 3D flightpath with apex height and hang time
One peculiar thing about the Garmin R10 is the video recording feature that overlays your shot data onto the footage. It makes the device stand out because it allows you to repeatedly see your swing and mechanical data for better analysis.
The R10 allows you to access virtual course simulations and game modes, which is great for players’ improvement.
The Skytrak launch monitor’s performance revolves around using photometric technology to give short readings. Unlike radar technology, Skytrack maintains its accuracy outdoors with this design.
I also love how the device simulates courses nicely on my tablet and laptop.
Data parameters
The fact that the Skytrak costs more than the R10 is a shocker, especially when it doesn’t offer as many measuring metrics as the R10 does.
When using the Garmin R10, you can track club head speed, club face angle, path angle, and angle of attack. The device also records ball speed, launch angle, direction, spin axis and rate, apex height, smash factor, and carry distance.
With the R10, you can also see your total distance and deviation distance.
On the other hand, the Skytrack launch monitor only measures ball speed, launch angle, back and side spin, side angle, carry distance, roll, and total distance.
You can also track club head speed, angle of decent, distance offline, a 3D flightpath with apex height, and hang time.
Ease of Use
The Garmin R10 has a straightforward setup, making it easier to use than the Skytrack launch monitor.
With the R10, you must connect the device to your phone or tablet via the Garmin Golf App.
The R10 is also more portable than the Skytrack, which makes it easier to move around. It’s smaller than a smartphone when it’s not loaded into the foldable tripod. So that counts as something under ease of use.
Accuracy
The Garmin Approach R10 uses radar to track shots, which favoured me the most when swinging outdoors. The device was accurate during testing, with a total distance of about 3 yards. Sadly, this dropped by about 5 yards when I took it indoors.
In the case of Skytrak, more accuracy was experienced indoors than outdoors. The high-speed cameras in this device ironically became a disadvantage for outdoor swings, especially because it was a sunny day and the light interfered with the cameras, which impacted the accuracy. This has been the experience of many other Skytrack owners.
I would recommend the Garmin R10 in a heartbeat if you want to practice at the range and need more reliable information.
Pros and cons
Indeed, there’s no perfect product out there. There are always two sides to the coin. To further help you decide which of these launch monitors is best for you, consider the pros and cons of each:
Garmin Approach R10
What I like
What I don’t like
Record all the data you could want. It’s a great value for the money.
You need to pay for a subscription to use the Home Tee Hero mode.
Easy to set up and use. Also very portable
It can take a few swings of trial and error to get it at the angle where the horizontal misses and correct it.
The automatic video recording feature is very helpful for analyzing your swing.
The launch direction accuracy was consistently off by at least 4 degrees.
It is still affordable, considering its high-tech
It would be better if slow motion were added to the video capabilities.
Stronger battery life than the Skytrack
SkyTrack Launch Monitor
What I like
What I don’t like
Reliable wireless connection
It can take between 5 and 7 seconds to pull up shout metrics.
The simulated renderings of famous courses look nice.
It’s expensive for budget-conscious golfers.
You can archive your shot data and review it whenever you want.
It doesn’t offer as many shot metrics as the R10 or even the Mevo Plus.
Not as portable as the R10
Verdict Summary
Although Skytrack is a solid device, it struggles a lot with the driver—high ball speeds—and with chipping and putting.
Also, the R10 can be used outdoors and is amazing outdoors, but the sky track struggled to provide consistent results outdoors. And even indoors, it required sufficient lightning. If you don’t have the space for the R10, the Skytrak is a great option at the price point and is fun for its value.
With these in mind, here’s my rating for both devices based on my experience with them:
Rating
Garmin Approach R10
SkyTrack
Metrics provided
10
8.0
Accuracy
9.5
7.0
Performance
9.0
8.0
Ease of Use
9.0
8.5
Looks
7.5
10
TOTAL (50 points):
45 points
41 points
The bottom line is that the Skytrack launch monitor is a better option if you operate with limited space, as it can sit facing the golfer just outside the ball starting position. In contrast, you need at least 1.8 to 2.4 meters behind the ball-starting job for the Garmin R10.
If you’re on a tight budget, the R10 is undoubtedly the best way to go, and you won’t regret the purchase.
Sports professionals typically use the best golf launch monitors, which can cost up to $1000 or more. If you’re just starting out or on a tight budget, options like Foresight Sports GCQuad or the Full Swing Kit will be overkill. Garmin Approach R10 and Rapsodo Mobile Launch Monitor (MLM) are among the few quality and budget-friendly launch monitors on the market presently, so it’s predictable for you to be conflicted between them. I tested both devices, and I will show you in this article how they measure up.
In brief, the Rapsodo MLM is the easiest to set up for practice between the two. It supplies accurate but basic information on swings and will make a great addition to your setup at home. On the other hand, the Garmin Approach R10, during the testing, proved to be a better option that can double up as a simulator. It is also a better option for outdoor usage. Still, the Rapsodo MLM is undoubtedly your best bet if you’re on a tight budget.
Maybe you’re looking to buy a personal launch monitor while under budget. The Rapsodo Mobile Launch Monitor (MLM)” and the Garmin R10 are expected to be the best options.
I have documented valuable information about these devices and how they compare across many relevant factors in this article. If you’re in a hurry, the table below will explain what sets these two launch monitors apart.
Garmin R10 vs. Rapsodo: Comparison Chart
The best way to figure out which of these products is best for your game is to consider broadly the characteristics and specifications of both of them. I have created this comparison chart to help you with that:
Factors
Garmin Approach R10
Rapsodo
Data parameters provided
Club Head Speed, Club Face Angle, Club Path Angle, Angle of Attack, Ball Speed, Launch Angle, Launch Direction, Spin Axis, Spin Rate, Apex Height, Smash Factor, Carry Distance, Total Distance, and Deviation Distance
Carry Distance, Side Carry, Spin Rate, Club Speed, Ball Speed, Vertical Launch, Smash Factor, Launch Angle, Apex Height, and Shot Type
Club Head Speed, Club Face Angle, Club Path Angle, Angle of Attack, Ball Speed, Launch Angle, Launch Direction, Spin Axis, Spin Rate, Apex Height, Smash Factor, Carry Distance, Total Distance, and Deviation Distance
The app and subscription service of both launch monitors are decent, but the Garmin R10 seems to be more bang for your buck because you can access courses alongside the launch monitor.
Rapsodo allows you to record every swing, but you only get 100 videos for free, which leaves you with two options: constantly delete videos or pay $99 for unlimited storage.
Performance
I have tasted several other budget-friendly launch monitors enough to realize that certain features and performances are generally expected from any launch monitor. So, it would be too much to call them grand.
But what sets the Garmin R10 apart is that it first requires you to set up a selfie stick or tripod to get a swing video, versus the Rapsodo MLM, which does this by default.
The Rapsodo does not capture videos from the best angle, so it is hard to do much swing evaluation, but it is hassle-free.
If set up properly, the Garmin is great. In the performance category, I’d say the Rapsodo does a bit better, but it is still up for debate because Garmin takes extra steps to get recordings, and the Rapsodo does not record from the best angle.
Data Parameters
There’s no straightforward way to make a judgment on which launch monitor outperforms the other when it comes to metrics. For instance, the Rapsodo and Garmin share such things as club speed, ball speed, apex, and distance, of which, during testing, results were pretty close to each other.
However, I did notice that the R10 extrapolates for club path, swing direction, angle of attack, and spin rates. This is the edge the R10 has over Rapsodo.
If you’re purchasing a launch monitor for fun and not necessarily for game improvement, then the Garmin R10 lapses won’t be a deal-breaker.
However, if you are looking for significant swing changes, the data on the Rapsodo appears to be more reliable.
Ease of Use
Rapsodo MLM reeks of simplicity, from the design to the usage. But it doesn’t defeat the Garmin on this one.
On the Garmin R10, there’s information overload—so many metrics to track, which can be a good thing and, ironically, a not-so-great item for those who just want a simple device for basic measurement.
Because I use an iPhone, I noticed while at the range that the Garmin was much easier to read all of your metrics, while Rapsodo requires you to exit the sessions and return before seeing some metrics. I wish the Rapsodo worked on this because it’s a hassle to leave the session and produce, especially when it’s single-swing data I want to look at.
The interface is different when you use an iPad, but many people use their iPhone, so it’s a flaw on the part of the Rapsodo.
Pros and cons
Indeed, there’s no perfect product out there. There are always two sides to the coin. To further help you decide which of these launch monitors is best for you, consider the pros and cons of each:
Garmin R10
What I like
What I don’t like
Record all the data you could want. It’s a great value for the money.
The course simulator costs $10 a month and is cartoony and not worth it compared to simply doing the practice range.
It comes with a companion app that makes it super easy to use.
Temperamental with alignment
With the R10, you can access courses to play if you want to use the portable device as a simulator.
No ball normalization feature
It is still affordable, considering its high-tech
It would be better if slow motion were added to the video capabilities.
Rapsodo
What I like
What I don’t like
Easy to set and use
It doesn’t display spin numbers.
Visual aid for your shots
Short battery life
It helps to track your performance with each club individually.
Not compatible with Android phones
Verdict Summary
Based on this elaborate comparison, the Garmin R10 appeared to be a better golf launch monitor than the Rapsodo, but it’s with a less significant margin. The R10 wins as the best launch monitor for under $600.
I think the ability to double as a sim can make the range a little bit more fun. This is what you won’t get with the Rapsodo MLM.
P.S.: The R10 comes with five courses and a driving range on E6, which is supposed to be a major bonus, but E6 sucked on my iPhone. It was so choppy and did a battery hog.
We’ve also explored other areas and how these two devices measure against each other. With these in mind, here’s my rating from my experience with using these two launch monitors:
Rating
Garmin Approach R10
Rapsodo
Data Offered
10
6.5
Accuracy
6.5
8.5
Performance
8.0
9.5
Ease of Use
6.5
7.0
Looks
9.0
6.0
TOTAL (50 points):
40 Points
37.5 Points
I’ve used the Rapsodo for a while before purchasing the R10 for this review. The R10 came as a recommendation because I was particular about knowing advanced metrics such as swing path, club face, and angle of attack.
I am a little disappointed in those metrics based on what I see online compared to advanced launch monitors like Trackman.
Of course, the R10 won’t perform like a $15,000 device, but the fact that the advanced metrics offered were even shaky doesn’t fully justify upgrading from Rapsodo.
However, this is because I already have a Rapsodo MLM. If you don’t have a launch monitor and this is your first purchase, I recommend the Garmin R10.
Flightscope Mevo and Garmin Approach R10 are powerful radar-based launch monitors that instantly come to mind when considering options well under $1,000. This is why many amateur golfers (even some pros) are often conflicted about which to choose. So which is best for you?
After testing both devices, I realized that the Garmin Approach R10 offers much more than the FlightScope Mevo (and even Mevo Plus). I noticed more precision with the R10’s metrics, richer visual graphics in game modes, water resistance for outdoor playing, and access to over 41,000 courses worldwide with E6 compatibility that Mevo doesn’t have.
Although the Mevo deserves its flowers, you can understand your shots better; the device has great battery life and receives constant feedback with the audio function. However, it does not measure horizontal and vertical launch angles and estimates spin based on club path and horizontal movement, as seen in the R10.
It could be that you’re looking to invest in a tracker without spending a fortune—just to be able to practice from home. The Mevo is more budget-friendly if you are seriously on a tight budget. But what will you be missing by forgoing R10 because of an additional hundred dollars?
You will find out in the rest of this article as I compare the Flightscope Mevo and Garmin Approach R10 launch monitors side-by-side.
Mevo vs. Garmin R10: Comparison Chart
The best way to figure out which of these products is best for your game is to consider broadly the characteristics and specifications of both of them. I have created this comparison chart to help you with that:
Factors
Flightscope Mevo
Garmin Approach R10
Metrics captured
Carry Distance, Spin Rate, Club Speed, Ball Speed, Vertical Launch, Smash Factor, Apex Height, and Flight Time
Club Head Speed, Club Face Angle, Club Path Angle, Angle of Attack, Ball Speed, Launch Angle, Launch Direction, Spin Axis, Spin Rate, Apex Height, Smash Factor, Carry Distance, Total Distance, and Deviation Distance
Club Head Speed, Club Face Angle, Club Path Angle, Angle of Attack, Ball Speed, Launch Angle, Launch Direction, Spin Axis, Spin Rate, Apex Height, Smash Factor, Carry Distance, Total Distance, and Deviation Distance
The app provides real-time data, including launch angle, ball speed, clubhead speed, spin rate, and more. It also tracks shot dispersion and offers club data to help you analyze your swing.
One standout feature of the Mevo app is its video integration, which allows you to overlay your swing data on your recorded swings for better analysis.
The Garmin Approach R10 uses the “Garmin Golf” app for data analysis. The app also lets you record your shots and review your session data.
One advantage of the Garmin app is that it connects to a broader ecosystem of Garmin devices, which can be appealing if you already use Garmin products.
Performance
It is undeniable that the Garmin R10 wins the Mevo in terms of performance. Garmin offers you a 6-course license for E6. So you can do realistic simulations on those courses. Other launch monitors, like Mevo (not Mevo Plus), only give you the driving range app.
If we compare the Garmin simulator app with Mevo’s, I’ll choose the latter because Gramin’s interface is very cartoony-looking. I also struggled with distance accuracy.
The saving grace is that it comes with E6 with 6 courses and a driving range, and I have found that to be spot on accuracy-wise and much more realistic-looking than anything offered in the Mevo.
The downside to the performance of the R10 is that consistent setup is important—you need 8 feet from ball to net or screen, and the R10 needs to be 7 feet behind you.
I’ve been using the Mevo indoors in my garage, but the R10 works greatly outdoors, thanks to the waterproofness that’s not present in the Mevo.
Data Parameters
The metrics captured are another area where the Garmin R10 wins against the Flightscope Mevo.
The Garmin R10 will measure club head speed, face angle, path angle, angle of attack, ball speed, launch angle and direction, spin axis and rate, apex height, and even smash factor.
You can also track carry, total, and deviation distances with the R10.
Unfortunately, the Mevo only records carry distance, spin rate, club speed, ball speed, vertical launch, smash factor, height, and flight time.
Ease of Use
When using the Mevo, you simply turn it on, sync Bluetooth, set it 6 feet behind your swing line, and fire away. The setup is straightforward, and you can use your phone (Android or iOS) to see results, including video.
The ease of setting up the R10 is arguable because the unit needs to be 6-7 feet behind and level with your ball. It’s hard to have that setup.
So I get surprised when many “experts” on forums recommend this unit for those looking for an entry-level shot tracker and simulator. (The price, maybe?)
Generally, you won’t struggle with any of these launch monitors if you’re not tech-savvy. Their designs are simple and easy to navigate around.
Accuracy
On many review platforms, users have agreed that the Garmin R10 sometimes doesn’t read some shots. During my first testing sessions, I set the R10 up next to a launch monitor that cost about 10 times the R10 price.
The distances were +/- 2 yds, the speeds were within five mph, and the Garmin provided some metrics the other unit didn’t offer (such as angle of attack). The spin rates were way apart (+/-1000 RPM).
So, I strongly believe that many reported cases of inaccuracy in the R10 have to do with positioning, which can take some time to get correctly. An alignment stand and a small height riser may be needed to make it catch your shots at the range. This tells us why the Mevo seems easier to use than the R10.
For the price, the Flightscope Mevo is an impressively accurate launch monitor. It missed only two of more than 100 shots taken during testing. And it gave accurate information regarding my swings.
Pros and cons
Indeed, there’s no perfect product out there. There are always two sides to the coin. To further help you decide which of these launch monitors is best for you, consider the pros and cons of each:
Flightscope Mevo
What I like
What I don’t like
Among the most accurate golf launch monitors are those under $500. You can rely on the FlightScope Mevo data to improve your swing.
It relies on your mobile device for its features.
The Mevo FS Golf App is simple and easy to navigate. It is ideal for non-tech-savvy golfers.
Not accurate with shorter shots
Easy to move around
The app consumes your phone battery quickly, especially when running in the background.
Instant feedback with the audio function
Garmin Approach R10
What I like
What I don’t like
Record all the data you could want. It’s a great value for the money.
The course simulator costs $10 a month and is cartoony and not worth it compared to simply doing the practice range.
It comes with a companion app that makes it super easy to use.
It can take a few swings of trial and error to get it at the angle where the horizontal misses and correct it.
With the R10, you can access courses to play if you want to use the portable device as a simulator.
Setup can be a bit finicky sometimes.
It is still affordable, considering its high-tech
It would be better if slow motion were added to the video capabilities.
Stronger battery life than the Mevo
Verdict Summary
Based on my comparison, I’ll crown the Garmin R10 as the superior device because it has a serious advantage over the ordinary Mevo. It could have stood a chance if the comparison was between Meco Plus. However, Mevo is an older model, so you can expect to miss out on a lot by sticking with it.
With this in mind, this is my verdict rating on a scale of 0 to 10 for each device based on my experience with them:
Rating
Flightscope Mevo
Garmin Approach R10
Data Options
7.0
10
Accuracy
8.5
6.5
Performance
6
9.5
Ease of Use
8.5
6.0
Looks
7.0
10
TOTAL (50 points):
37 points
42 points
In a list of popular portable launch monitors, it’s hard to ignore the Flightscope Mevo and Garmin Approach R10.
In this article, I have attempted to pit the Mevo versus the Garmin R10 across key areas that should help you decide which is best based on your specific golf simulator needs.
Despite the win of the R10, there’s no clear winner when comparing the FlightScope and Garmin R10, as they both have pros and cons. If you’re on a tight budget, the Mevo is the sure bet, and you won’t regret the purchase.
The FlightScope is slightly more accurate when measuring ball flight, but the Garmin R10 is more user-friendly and has more features. But the E6 compatibility of the R10 will easily win buyers over.
What do you think about these two launch monitors? Let me know in the comments.
If you’re looking for a launch monitor under a $500 budget, the FlightScope Mevo and Rapsodo MLM are two profound options you can never go wrong with. I’ve tested both, and I can say that none are bad. But let’s be real; you probably won’t buy both. So which is a better option for you than the other?
Long story short, its user-friendliness makes the Rapsodo better than the Flightscope Mevo. However, the Mevo showed more accuracy during my testing than the Rapsodo.
People buy launch monitors for different reasons. Your reason for getting a budget-friendly launch monitor can influence how you see these two rival products. In my case, I don’t have an indoor hitting space; my primary usage for a launch monitor is enhancing my practice at the range. So, I was more interested in a tool that could accurately collect my ball and swing stats, gapping, gamification, fun, etc.
I learned a lot of differences between the Flightscope Mevo and Rapsodo, which I have decided to document in this review to help anyone who is conflicted between the two products and needs to make a decision.
Rapsodo vs. Mevo: Comparison Chart
The best way to figure out which of these products is best for your game is to consider broadly the characteristics and specifications of both of them. I have created this comparison chart to help you with that:
Factors
Flightscope Mevo
Rapsodo
Data parameters provided
Carry Distance, Spin Rate, Club Speed, Ball Speed, Vertical Launch, Smash Factor, Apex Height, and Flight Time
Carry Distance, Side Carry, Spin Rate, Club Speed, Ball Speed, Vertical Launch, Smash Factor, Launch Angle, Apex Height, and Shot Type
The Rapsodo seems to have an edge over the Flightscope Mevo in the app interface and design. I like the slick graphics, video, and audio readout of statistics and tables for post-round analysis in the Rapsodo App.
Although the Rapsodo app is less customizable compared to the Mevo On Mevo, you can remove shanks or mishits that don’t represent your normal shot. You also get visual and audio readouts of stats during practice.
But most importantly, the states and tables are easily digestible.
The graphics on the Mevo app aren’t incredible, and there’s no visual overlay or real gamification.
The Rapsodo shines in these areas—there’s a graphical overlay based on a GPS map of your range.
Both launch monitor apps can sync video if you mount the phone somewhere.
Performance
Regarding performance, the Mevo will take the crown because, during my testing, it only missed two shots out of more than 100 ball hits. I was expecting the app to crash, but it didn’t, and the stats are all customizable and accessible.
I also like how, with the Memo, the software is ready for the next shot before the first one hits the ground, which is good if you’re interested in simple rapid-firing practice.
On the other hand, Rapsodo did perform well, with pretty impressive results. But it was not the best experience for usage. At one point, the device stopped recording video due to my iPhone XR overheating. It also missed about 8% of the shots, many of which were pitch shots.
Still, these won’t make me deny how impressed I was with the Rapsodo’s great visuals for the shots and games that make the overall experience fun.
The battery performance of both launch monitors appeared to be equally decent.
Data Parameters
As mentioned earlier, Flightscope Mevo will capture ball speed, club speed, backspin rpm, carry yards, launch angle, smash factor, peak height, and time in the air.
I was disappointed to discover that it doesn’t record sidespin or angle. In other words, when using the Mevo, you can’t know how far offline you are.
Rapsodo, on the other hand, captures all the data that the Mevo does, but it also records launch direction. So this is the launch monitor to choose if you seriously prioritize knowing how far you are offline with each shot.
The Rapsodo still does not record backspin rpm, which is a deal-breaker when hitting drivers and wedges. But again, it boils down to your preference for these parameters.
Ease of Use
Based on the comparison I documented when testing both launch monitors, I think it is fair to say that the Mevo is superior to the Rapsodo regarding ease of use. But I still have reservations about this conclusion.
When using the Mevo, you simply turn it on, sync Bluetooth, set it 6 feet behind your swing line, and fire away. The setup is straightforward, and you can use your phone (Android or iOS) to see results, including video.
Rapsodo has the same procedure for usage. However, you have to set your iPhone to line up with your swing for automatic video.
The hugest edge in terms of ease of use that the Mevo will have over the Rapsodo is that it allows for both Android and iOS, while Rapsodo works with iOS only.
Pro Tip:
You must mount your phone separately when using video to see results.
Don’t bother buying Rapsodo if you don’t have an iPhone or iPad.
Accuracy
For the price, the Flightscope Mevo is an impressively accurate launch monitor compared to the Rapsodo. It missed only two of more than 100 shots taken during testing. And it gave accurate information regarding my swings.
The Mevo does lag in tracking launch angle and spin rate. But it does other sites decently.
Meanwhile, Rapsodo is also one of the most accurate devices for its price, but the lag in spin rate affects the overall accuracy. So, while it gets the job done, I have more confidence in the memo when it boils down to precision.
Pros and cons
Indeed, there’s no perfect product out there. There are always two sides to the coin. To further help you decide which of these launch monitors is best for you, consider the pros and cons of each:
Flightscope Mevo
What I like
What I don’t like
You can understand your shots better with the feature-rich app.
It relies on your mobile device for its features.
Drive accuracy is decent.
Not accurate with shorter shots
The device has great battery life.
The app consumes your phone battery quickly, especially when running in the background.
Instant feedback with the audio function
Rapsodo
What I like
What I don’t like
Easy to set and use
Not a great launch monitor for outdoor use
Visual aid for your shots
Short battery life
It helps to track your performance with each club individually.
Not compatible with Android phones
Verdict Summary
Overall, based on my comparison, I’ll crown the Rapsodo as the superior device because, if you think about it, the only real advantages Mevo offers are visuals from different angles, video playback options, and spin rate measurement (a small silver sticker installation on each ball is even needed to make this happen).
With this in mind, this is my verdict rating on a scale of 0 to 10 for each device based on my experience with them:
Rating
Flightscope Mevo
Rapsodo
Data Options
5.0
7.0
Accuracy
8.5
6.0
Performance
9.0
8.5
Ease of Use
6.5
9.0
Looks
8.5
8
TOTAL:
37.5
38.5
Flightscope Mevo and the Rapsodo MLM will remain among the best options for budget-friendly launch monitors.
In a perfect world, I’d love to merge some of the perks of the Rapsodo with those of the Mevo. One falls short in the area where the other shines. So, you have to forgo a particular advantage.
They are both enjoyable to use. To be fair, both are great, which explains the marginal win. So you don’t have to be worried about investing in a bad option. However, when it comes down to it, you’d want to buy one.
In that case, I’d recommend the Rapsodo over the Flightscope Mevo.
If you’re particularly torn between the Callaway Rogue ST and the PXG Gen 4 driver, this review is for you. I bought and played both drivers to see how they compare to each other and have documented the entire experience in this review.
Both driver brands are dramatically different. The Rogue ST is game-improvement-oriented, as it offers forgiveness and distance. It’s chunky with a medium swing weight, and somehow, it feels like you’re hitting the ball with a toaster.
On the other hand, the PXG Gen 4 provides a premium feel and customization options, so it’s the best fit if you prioritize precision and personalization. There’s a lot of tech in these drivers, but they’re not a hollow cavity back (since they’re filled with foam) and do not feel like a hollow cavity back.
Being a mid-high handicapper, I have a naturally low ball flight and have trouble hitting the ball thin; the light swing weight and flat sole of the Rouge ST exacerbate that.
One thing I quickly discovered is that these clubs are both very forgiving. I also noticed both of them, on those low hits, still fly pretty well on both drivers.
I only had to get a little higher than I usually do. (I am yet to determine the reason, but I get better ball flight with these clubs when I tee up just a hair longer than normal.)
First hits
Second hits
Third hits
On several swings, the PXG was in a much better spot with a lower miss hit on the club, while the rogue was just off in the rough but a little bit longer.
Looks, Sound, and Feel
I seriously like the looks of the PXG Gen 4 driver. It’s an appealing view when you look down on the club. It pulls your eyes in the way that those lines are angled on the top of the club head. So it has an appealing edge over the Callaway.
In terms of feel and sound, the Callaway Rogue ST wins the belt, in my honest opinion, because it has a nice, pleasant thud to its impact and gives wonderful feedback from the club. That way, you can easily identify when you have mishits.
The best way I can describe the sound of the PXG Gen 4 is like snapping a gym towel. You don’t get the most pleasant sound when you hit this club, but it makes up for the result.
Forgiveness
Judging forgiveness with these drivers will be tricky because they are both good. However, the Rogue ST drivers incorporate VFT technology, meaning the face thickness varies across the clubface.
This helps to optimize ball speed on off-center hits, making mishits less punishing and providing more consistent distance.
PXG Gen 4 drivers are designed to offer a premium feel and precision, and while they still provide forgiveness, they may not have the same level of forgiveness as the Rogue ST drivers.
From my experience with these drivers, I figured PXG focuses more on customization and providing a premium experience. So, we can expect this to lead to a slightly different design philosophy.
Workability
If you’re super intentional about your improvement, workability should be an important consideration when picking between these two tough drivers.
You want to know which of them can help your ability to shape their shots intentionally, whether it’s drawing the ball (curving it from right to left for right-handed golfers) or fading it (turning it from left to right for right-handed golfers).
I hit that low hooking shot with both drivers pretty much the same. There was a slightly higher trajectory with the Callaway Rogue and a downward trajectory with the PXG.
There’s nothing much between these two, and I didn’t expect to see much because both are truly forgiving clubs.
Shafts
Regarding shafts, I believe a good club is not just about the head. The post, in combination, will do the magic.
Many people think that once you can find a quality shaft, you can put it in every driver’s head, which is not always ideal because both components must work in tandem.
For this reason, I stuck with stock configurations that you can easily find off the rack. I try to pair a stiff 60g when possible with the stock configuration of the manufacturer.
For the PXG, I used the Hazardous Smoke Yellow Shaft, 60 grams. For the Callaway Rogue, I paired it with the Mitsushibi Tensei Shaft 55 gram and stiff flex.
Price Value
The PXG sells for $529 but at a limited discount of $200. It is an incredible value, dollar for dollar. They also offer military discounts. But I believe $200 is still a great value for what you’re getting. The Callaway Rogue, on the other hand, costs $400 with a stock shaft configuration.
The comparison is pretty definitive. The Callaway Rogue ST takes the lead regarding forgiveness, distance, and accuracy. But again, it depends on your playing style and your budget.
The Rogue ST offers forgiveness and distance. I’ll strongly recommend it as a game-improvement club. The PXG Gen 4 also wins on many grounds, but it would be the best if you need precision and customization options.
Putters, especially the ones with larger heads, like to interfere with how the rest of the clubs stand in golf bags. This can cause aesthetic damage to the other clubs. If you’re worried about this, then you need a putter holder. Sadly, many options online are cheap, with discouraging reviews. So far, I’ve been able to test and review the three best options.
Here’s a list of the best putter holders for golf bags and why I recommend them:
Key Takeaway: I strongly recommend the Club Champ Sports Premium Putter Holder if you need an all-round, versatile, sturdy, and affordable putter holder. However, options like the Dwawoo Golf Club Putter Clip Holder offer great value for money because it is packed with five pieces and has a 180-day return policy. If you want an option that’s the easiest to use, the Horne Golf Mighty Putter Clip Holder is your best bet.
People need putter holders for different reasons. In my case, I had a putter with an oversized counterweighted grip. As someone who used the Callaway Warbird bag, it was not practical to store putters with large grips because they caught inside the bag. I eventually invested in the Club Champ Sports Premium Putter Holder, which has been bliss. However, it’s not the only option I’ve tested.
In the rest of this article, I will explain in detail how these top recommendations work to help you decide which is best for you. In case you’re in a hurry, here’s a table comparing all the products across relevant buying factors:
Made with durable plastic, it guarantees longevity. Quick access is a breeze, and it fits most bags seamlessly.
Unlike most other options, it keeps falling off after the first use. And the red part won’t pop out after 30 rounds, which I have experienced with other similar products.
What I like about this putter holder
Clips onto your bag
Keeps your putter handy
A soft TPR insert protects the shaft.
Minimal design and easily maneuverable
What I don’t like about this putter holder
None so far.
2. Horne Golf Mighty Putter Clip Holder for the Golf Bag
Horne Golf Mighty Putter Clip Holder
$10
Ideal for cart golf bags with grips pointing upwards.
Preserves the grip and ball retriever prongs.
Facilitates easy ball retrieval from the cup.
Crafted from heavy-duty nylon, offering greater durability than standard putter clips.
The sturdy plastic clip easily hangs my putter from the bag’s edge, although it’s a tad loose on a soft Sunday bag I occasionally use. If it were slightly larger, it would grip better.
The clip includes two installation rings for versatile attachment to any golf bag. Crafted from heavy-duty nylon, it’s more durable than standard putter clips.
It’s fantastic for smaller bags or those with bulky grips, ensuring your putter stays put on the cart.
What I like about this putter holder
It saves the grip and ball retriever prongs.
makes it so easy to pick up your ball from the cup.
What I don’t like about this putter holder
The putter holder is built of strong nylon and not hard plastic.
3. Dwawoo Golf Club Putter Clip Holder with Ball Marker
Dwawoo Golf Club Putter Clip Holder with Ball Marker
$10
Serves to safeguard clubs from damage and is an excellent putting companion.
Includes a warranty guaranteeing durability.
Made of tough plastic, offering stability and longevity for everyday use.
The wide clip easily clamps onto the side of your golf bag.
The Dwawoo Golf Club Putter Clip comes in a pack of five clips that serve various purposes, including safeguarding clubs from damage and serving as an ideal putting companion.
Even better is the included warranty, which guarantees the clip’s durability. Overall, if you seek a top-notch, sturdy putter clip with a reliable ball marker, the Dwawoo Golf Club Clip is a wise investment.
What I like about this putter holder
Made of tough plastic, it is stiff and stable enough to endure everyday use.
The wide clip can easily clamp onto the side of your golf bag.
Should I mount the putter holder internally or externally on the golf bag?
I recommend mounting your putter holder internally because it can provide a cleaner and sleeker look for your golf bag as it keeps the putter holder hidden from view.
Also, your putter is more protected from potential damage when mounted internally, as it is shielded within the bag.
However, mounting it externally would be ideal if you desire quick and easy access to your putter, especially during your round. Also, when you mount it externally, your putter is more visible, which can be a visual reminder to use it more often or a conversation starter with other golfers.
If you have multiple putters or frequently switch putters, external mounting makes more sense since, that way, you can easily change putters.
Finally
Using putter holders separates the putter from the rest of the bag so that club heads don’t stack against each other.
The putter holders reviewed in the above article can be mounted externally and internally on your golf bag, depending upon the need.
Many cheap products are out there, so this review has few recommendations. I only focused on putter holders that are sturdy, well-designed, and easy to install.
The best low-compression golf balls are softer in their core and have an overall feel off the club face. Their ability to compress easier will be beneficial if you have a slow swing speed because it translates to maximized distance. Looking for the best models to pick for low compression? Here are the best options I’ve tested so far:
Here’s a list of the best compression golf ballsand why I recommend them:
One of the lessons I’ve learned in my ten years of playing golf and watching other professionals is that spending a lot doesn’t always guarantee your game will improve. Regarding golf balls, many beginners think they should be playing a Titleist Pro V1 or TaylorMade TP5.
Apart from the fact that these balls cost upward of $6 each, they may not be the best match for you. Each golf ball model is designed for a special purpose. Hitting low-compression golf balls as a beginner, senior golfer, or player with a slower swing speed will put you on the right track to improving your game.
In case you’re in a hurry, the table below gives you a rundown of the top recommendations I’ll review in this article and how they individually measure up in areas of compression, wedge spin, layer, and, of course,
olf ball
Layer Construction
Compression
Price (a dozen)
TaylorMade Noodle Long & Soft
2
60
$25
Bridgestone E12 CONTACT
3
46
$30
Callaway Supersoft
2
38
$25
Srixon Q-Star Tour
3
72
$35
TaylorMade Tour Response Stripe
3
70
$43
Srixon Soft Feel
2
60
$23
Vice Pro Soft
3
35
$38
*at the time of publishing
Picking one out of the myriad of options on the market can be challenging. I have created this review to serve as a guide for you. I encourage you to read further to learn how each ball is performed as a low-compression golf ball.
1. TaylorMade Noodle Long & Soft
TaylorMade Noodle Long & Soft
$25
Budget-friendly at just $1 per ball
Urethane cover allows for spin with wedges and short irons
They are beginner-friendly, delivering distance off the tee and playability on the greens
Tailored for slow swing speeds, the TaylorMade Noodle golf balls provide a soft feel and low to average spin, making them a solid choice.
You will easily find your perfect match in the TaylorMade Noodle golf balls if you have slow swing speeds. They balance low to average spin and a soft feel, saving you from the agony of using harder options.
At just a buck a ball, I don’t cringe when a few go missing during a round. The latest edition’s medium compression score complements my moderate swing speed, thanks to the Impact Propulsion Core that aids energy transfer.
Moreover, the soft urethane cover allows your wedges and short irons to create spin, although it’s no tour ball. These balls are a beginner’s dream—long off the tee, gentle on the greens, and budget-friendly.
What I like about this golf ball
Offers easy launching
Affordable set of golf balls
It provides low and long-gam spin
You will achieve straighter flights with these balls.
What I don’t like about this golf ball
Because it provides straighter flight, it has a lower workability than most other low-compression balls.
It’s not a good option for more experienced players.
2. Bridgestone E12 CONTACT
Bridgestone E12 CONTACT
$30
Offers a soft feel off the club face.
The innovative “FLEXATIV” Surlyn cover adapts to swing, improving speed and spin control
The Bridgestone e12 CONTACT, with its low-compression design, enhances game by delivering straighter shots
The updated Bridgestone e12 CONTACT is a top choice for golfing with a low-compression ball. It can improve your game by delivering straighter shots and adding distance.
The innovative “FLEXATIV” Surlyn cover can adapt to your swing, enhancing speed and spin control. Each dimple design minimizes sidespin for more precise shots.
The Active Acceleration Mantle boosts initial velocity, which is perfect if you do once-a-week games with limited practice.
This ball consistently performed with my driver, Cobra F7+, irons, and wedges. While not a pro-level ball, it is suitable for recreational golf, ensuring you enjoy the game with your family.
It’s durable and worth the price, and it can easily become your favorite go-to ball.
What I like about this golf ball
The Flexiv Cover is Straighter Off the Tee
Dimples, slow sidespin
Soft feel off the club face
Available in different colors for enhanced visibility on the golf course.
What I don’t like about this golf ball
None so far.
3. Callaway Supersoft
Callaway Supersoft
$25
The Callaway Supersoft ball impresses with its “HyperElastic SoftFast” core, delivering increased ball speed without compromising the soft feel.
Excellent choice for golfers seeking consistency, greenside control, and a super soft feel.
Improved durability, while the “Hex Aerodynamic” dimple pattern ensures longer and higher flights.
While testing the Callaway Supersoft ball for this review, the most terrific discovery is that the new “HyperElastic SoftFast” core boosted ball speed while maintaining that signature soft feel.
The hybrid cover provided low spin on long shots, a great feel on short game shots, and improved durability. The “Hex Aerodynamic” dimple pattern ensured longer and higher flights.
Additionally, the SuperSoft Alignment Aid improved putting accuracy. The Soft Compression Core delivered maximum ball speed, high launch, and low spin for extra distance.
These balls are perfect for golfers seeking consistency and greenside control, offering a super soft feel and excellent putting experience.
My drives gained 10 yards, and iron shots went 15 yards further, making a noticeable difference in the game.
I highly recommend it to anyone struggling with their score.
What I like about this golf ball
The new HyperElastic SoftFast Core offers faster speed.
More durable cover
Thanks to Hex Aerodynamics, it reduces drag.
30-Day “Performance Guarantee”
What I don’t like about this golf ball
It’s not even manageable for players with faster or medium swing speeds.
4. Srixon Q-Star Tour
Srixon Q-Star Tour
$35
Offers low compression for moderate swing speed
Spin Skin with SERM Technology
Delivers increased friction and maximum spin for wedges and irons
Seamlessly combines distance with a soft feel, enhancing the overall performance
Many people place the Srixon Q-STAR TOUR golf ball alongside the Callaway SuperSoft. For the sake of this review, I had to try both with this comparison in mind.
If you have moderate swing speed, the Q-STAR TOUR’s low compression will deliver the distance you need to outperform your competition and the greenside spin necessary to tackle tough pins.
The FastLayer Core seamlessly combines distance and a soft feel, while the Spin Skin with SERM technology ensures maximum spin for your wedges and irons.
The new longer side stamp aids in crucial putt alignment. Despite a slightly higher price tag than the SuperSoft, the Q-Star Tour is worth every penny for a superior golfing experience.
What I like about this golf ball
Increased friction and maximum spin.
FastLayer Core offers distance and a soft feel.
A new longer side stamp helps align those critical putts.
What I don’t like about this golf ball
Quite pricey compared to others
5. TaylorMade Tour Response Stripe
TaylorMade Tour Response Stripe
$43
Strikes a perfect balance between driver distance and green control
Great design and feel
Premium, lower-compression ball that delivers enhanced performance
Featuring the 360° “ClearPath Alignment” feature, it aids in faster and more consistent putt aiming
The TaylorMade Tour Response Stripe is a top choice for golfers seeking a premium, lower-compression ball that elevates performance from the tee to the greens.
The 360° “ClearPath Alignment” feature aids in faster, more consistent putt aiming and displays chip shot spin.
With a 3-piece construction focused on maximizing energy transfer for increased ball speed and a 100% urethane cover, it offers excellent spin and feel.
It strikes the perfect balance between driver distance and green control.
The Response Stripe enhances alignment and practice, making it ideal for all-around golfers.
What I like about this golf ball
Great design and feel.
Visually appealing
It is easy to find and really helpful when lining up for putting.
What I don’t like about this golf ball
Not the best option for budget-conscious buyers
Expensive
6. Srixon Soft Feel
Srixon Soft Feel
$23
Speed dimple pattern reduces drag and increases lift for enhanced distance
Popular for casual golf rounds due to affordability, easy launch, and softness
338 Speed Dimple Pattern results in a higher ball flight
Soft center and firm outer edge strike a balance between softness and distance
The Srixon Soft Feel has become another popular choice for casual golf rounds thanks to its affordability, easy launch, and delightful softness.
While it may not match the spin of high-end tour golf balls, it surpasses most distance-oriented options.
For golfers with moderate to slow swing speeds, it’s a fantastic value. The FastLayer Core impressively compresses on impact, offering a quick rebound and lower spin.
This combination results in a good distance off the tee and on long approaches.
The speed dimple pattern aids in reducing drag and increasing lift, enhancing overall distance.
Its soft center and firm outer edge create a perfect balance of softness and distance.
What I like about this golf ball
There is a perfect amount of spin for all short-game shots.
FastLayer Core provides plenty of distance off the tee.
338 Speed Dimple Pattern results in higher ball flight
Great on games like chips, pitches, and putts due to the softer feel.
What I don’t like about this golf ball
Only available in white and yellow
7. Vice Pro Soft
Vice Pro Soft
$38
Vice Golf balls, like the Vice Pro Soft, impress despite being a newer brand in the market.
Features the “High Energy Speed Core” and a 318 dimple design.
Ultra-thin urethane cover for improved performance.
I’ve been thoroughly impressed with Vice Golf’s balls, despite their relatively newer presence than a brand like Titleist in the golf ball market.
With its innovative “High Energy Speed Core” and 318 dimple design, the Vice Pro Soft is an answered prayer for slower swingers. Thanks to the ultra-thin urethane cover, it delivers increased ball speeds and exceptional control around the greens. Plus, the vice alignment line ensures precise cutting.
Having tried both Vice and Pro V1 balls, I noticed the main difference lies in spin for approach shots and chipping.
Vice offers slightly less spin but better rollout, making them an excellent value, especially if spin isn’t your top priority.
They remind me of Srixon Q-Star Tour balls. Vice Golf can easily win you with its fantastic feel and distance.
What I like about this golf ball
Lower prices for bulk buying options
Optimized alignment lines
What I don’t like about this golf ball
None so far.
Final Thoughts: Who Should Use Low-Compression Golf Balls?
Unlike high-compression balls, low-compression golf balls are softer and easier to compress. They will benefit ladies, high handicaps, and seniors because these categories of players would prioritize more distance.
However, the added distance off the tee won’t necessarily include added accuracy unless you’re hitting well. So, as you invest in these low-compression balls, practice more to perfect your swing performance.
I hope this article has simplified your search for the next low-compression golf balls you will buy.
The reason Mizuno MP-33 irons are so popular is that they are simple, clean, classic blades that have a minimum level of badges and branding on them and, of course, offer an over-the-top “buttery soft” feel compared to many other modern blade irons on the market today.
Many tour professionals patronize Mizuno golf clubs more than other world tours. The Japanese brand is celebrated for selling many of the finest forged irons in the industry. The MP-33 models have been receiving lots of love, especially from players who love vintage golf gear. What’s special about the MP-33 irons, and should you game with them?
I have been hitting three sets of MP-33s for a while now. And being blades, they require a consistent swing. This is the only way to enjoy the feel and trajectory that many praise these irons for.
The lofts are traditional, so they will feel like they hit a little shorter, but accuracy is unmatched. One noteworthy thing is that after hitting the MP-33, I could hit any iron.
In the rest of this article, I’ll review the Mizuo MP-33 irons to show you why it’s getting lots of love from players and how it might be a good fit for you.
Mizuno MP-33 iron review
When you look closer at the MP-33, you will notice a striking resemblance in design and aesthetics to the popular MS-3 blade. What truly sets the MP-33 apart is the updated profile and sole grind on the side region.
Muzino rolled out the MP-33 two decades ago, primarily for workability but without sacrificing substantial forgiveness. Here are the key details of the MP-33 iron set:
Mizuno MP-33 Iron
$250-300
Low Center of Gravity
Forged from Select 1025 Mild Carbon Steel
Excellent fit for low- or mid-handicap players who prioritize control, shot-shaping ability, and a soft, responsive feel
Elegant, premium look with minimal branding
MP-33 Iron Specifications
Details
Material
Select 1025 Mild Carbon Steel
Loft angle
Between 16° and 46°
Length option
From 35.25″ to 39.75″ (0.5″ differences between each length option)
Available on the resale value on various websites. Usually between $250 and $550.
The MP-33 is a curved muscle-back blade with an amazing lower center of gravity than many other blade models, so you can leverage this feature to boost your ball’s flight quickly. Here’s my full review of this iron set after playing it for a while:
First Impression
When I see Mizuno Irons, I think of Nick Faldo, an English retired professional golfer in the 90s. Mizuno has probably built this generation of irons on rock and roll because of their experiences with Nick Faldo and the other pros.
This gives meaning to the good base and studding appearance that the MP-33 has. The first positive impression of this club is its look and design.
This club combines the best features of various Mizuno irons with an MP-9 face profile, camber and radius, and the sole of the MP-14.
As expected from forged irons, they offer excellent ball control and flight. Mizuno’s Select 1025 Mild Carbon Steel and their “Grain Flow Forging” process ensure a consistent feel and top-notch quality.
The design enhancements, such as:
The sole chamber and optimized sweet spot provide maximum workability and trajectory control.
The sole shape minimizes turf dragging and digging.
The consistent offset throughout the set is a plus.
One standout feature is the unique center of gravity (COG), which is lower than most, improving ball flight.
Irons available on the MP-33 set:
Irons range from a 3-iron to a pitching wedge.
No hybrids or gap wedges are included.
What year did the Mizuno MP-33 come out?
The Mizuno MP-33 irons were initially released in 2002, so these irons have been on the market for over 20 years.
Over time, we’ve seen newer blade irons with similar curved muscle back blades as the MP-33 and with even more unique tech features. However, the MP-33 still wins the interest of many today because it has a lower center of gravity than many other blade models.
How did it perform?
After playing these iron sets for a while, it quickly comes to mind whenever I think of the perfect iron feel of buttery smoothness, consistency, and feedback.
The MP33s are pushing 20 years old, but I still play and love them. As someone who has played more recent blade irons, I can attest that it does feel like I’m missing out on the technology in more modern blades.
Newer muscle back blades have a head size approximately 20% larger than blades produced during the 1980’s. The “technology” difference between the two eras is mostly head size.
If you like your MP33s but want to try a larger head size, consider the MP69, produced about a decade ago.
My biggest complaint about these irons is the same thing most people complain about. The wear on the face of these irons can be discouraging.
We don’t see that happening on Callaway Hawk Eye VFT Titanium clubs and other similar irons.
But that’s the price for the buttery, soft, and smooth feel.
Are Mizuno MP-33 irons hard to hit?
The Mizuno MP-33 irons are less forgiving and more demanding to hit than some of the more modern game-improvement irons I’ve played.
They are designed with a traditional blade-style head, featuring a smaller sweet spot and less perimeter weighting.
So skilled and consistent golfers will benefit from this design more than beginners. To fully enjoy hitting the MP-33, prioritize control and shot-shaping ability over forgiveness.
If you have a consistent swing and good ball-striking skills, the MP-33 can offer exceptional precision and feedback.
However, beginners or those with less consistent swings may find it difficult to hit consistently, which can translate to potentially lower performance in the long run.
Who should play with the Mizuno MP-33 iron?
If you’re a low- or mid-handicap player, the Mizuno MP 33 irons will work for you best. It will be useful if you want precision, shot-shaping ability, and a soft, responsive feel.However, if your top priority is distance and forgiveness, these irons aren’t the best choice for you on the market.
Beyond the nostalgic and vintage appeal, this blade’s design offers excellent feedback. So it rewards well-struck shots with exceptional control, not the image of a beginner trying to find their way around hitting the greens.
Pros
Encourages improvement in strike quality and consistency
outstanding control and feel for those who consistently strike the sweet spot
Buttery feel
Elegant, premium look with minimal branding
Cons
Off-center hits can be unforgiving.
It may be challenging for high-handicap golfers.
Largely available as pre-owned
Final thoughts
When it comes to quality forged blade irons, Mizuno needs no introduction. They are well known for their soft feel. The MP 33 is no longer in production but remains one of the purest-looking blades ever.
If you’re a diehard fan of blades and are between mid- and low handicap, these are the sticks for you.
But if you need something more modern, the MP-69 irons are the new version of the MP-33.
Bottom line, the MP-33 still holds its title because they are simple, clean, classic blades and deliver the “buttery soft” feel that Mizunos are known for.
Do you have any experience with the MP-33 irons? Feel free to share in the comments; let’s relive the nostalgic moments of golf sports.
If you have shaky hands, getting accurate distance measurements with a standard golf rangefinder can be difficult. There are specialized rangefinders built for players with shaky hands. Unfortunately, not all devices in this category provide the ‘enhanced stability features’ they advertise.
I reviewed a few top recommendations on the market, particularly those that prioritize vibrations, offer better grip options, and use advanced stabilization technology. These five devices stood out from the rest.
Here’s a list of the best rangefinders for shaky hands and why I recommend them:
I don’t struggle with golf rangers. I’ve had no issues using the Gogogo Sports Vpro for a while. However, when I planned to gift my father a rangefinder, I needed to be intentional about stability features. He’s a 70+-year-old amateur golfer who would seriously appreciate models that help with shaky hands.
Though expensive, the Nikon Coolshot ProII did the trick, and it has been his favorite. If you’re in a similar situation, I strongly recommend you prioritize the factors I took into consideration:
A reliable built-in stabilization technique
Comfortable in your hands
Flag Lock technology
Quick and precise measurements
All the devices I’ve ranked in this review excel in the above areas. However, you still have to pick one, right? I’ve provided a table below comparing these top recommendations across relevant factors to help you make a decision quicker, in case you’re in a hurry:
The built-in hand support strap minimizes shaking.
$300
Bushnell V5 Shift
320g
6x
Yes
PinSeeker with Visual JOLT technology
$320
I encourage you to read about how each of these devices performs and why they work well for players with shaky hands. This can further help you decide the best pick for your situation.
1. Nikon Coolshot ProII Stabilized: Best Overall
Nikon Coolshot ProII Stabilized
$500
Perfect accuracy, including a vibrational pin lock and multi-target mode.
Nikon’s decades of expertise in stabilization technology truly shine in this rangefinder. This is a dream gadget, from perfect accuracy and a vibrational pin lock to a multi-target mod and an adjustable display! Plus, it’s waterproof.
Its white casing with cool blue accents looks stylish, rugged, and waterproof, ideal for those rainy golf days.
What sets this rangefinder apart is its award-winning stabilization technology, which ensures precision in yardage measurements, regardless of hand stability. It was voted the best golf rangefinder in 2018 for golfers with shaky hands.
The red OLED display is easily read against the green golf course backdrop. The slope toggle is convenient and tournament-legal when turned off. Plus, it comes with a microfiber towel and an extra battery for uninterrupted play.
What I like about this rangefinder
It’s simply the perfect product for golfers with shaky hands.
Easily turn Slope on or off.
Image stabilization and laser stabilization
Sleek design.
What I don’t like about this rangefinder
Expensive
2. Bushnell Tour V4: Best feature-rich rangefinder
Bushnell Tour V4
$215
Precision powerhouse with laser accuracy within half a yard.
Impressive 1000-yard range with the ability to lock onto flags within 400 yards.
Accuracy within just one yard, making it a favorite among PGA Tour players.
Jolt technology for flag locking, ensuring precise measurements.
This rangefinder is a precision powerhouse with laser accuracy within half a yard and Jolt technology for flag locking. It’s your perfect companion if shaky hands have been holding you back.
With a 1000-yard range and the ability to lock onto flags within 400 yards, it’s impressively accurate, differing by just one yard. No wonder it’s a favorite among PGA Tour players, providing speedy and precise readings. The ergonomic case is comfortable, though some might find it much bulkier than newer models.
What I like about this rangefinder
A favorite for many pro players
Flag acquisition and lock technology
Fast and accurate.
What I don’t like about this rangefinder
A bit older version
It can be better in terms of lightweight.
Not budget-friendly
3. Blue Tees Golf Series 2 Pro: Best value for money rangefinder
Blue Tees Golf Series 2 Pro
$200
Top-tier model in the Series 2 lineup, known for its excellent performance.
HD display with an adjustable optical focus system for crystal-clear visuals up to 800 yards.
Enhanced flag-lock feature for easy targeting of pins.
Tournament legal when the slope feature is turned off.
This rangefinder is the top-tier model in the Series 2 lineup and truly lives up to its reputation.
One of the standout features is the HD display with an adjustable optical focus system. It provides crystal-clear visuals up to 800 yards, ensuring you never miss a detail on the course. Plus, the enhanced flag-lock feature makes targeting pins a breeze.
Its slope switch technology sets the Series 2 Pro+ apart, which accurately adjusts distances, factoring in hills and slopes for precise club selection. The best part is that you can easily turn off this feature for tournament play, ensuring compliance with the rules.
Another noteworthy aspect is its durability. This rangefinder is built to withstand rain and dew, making it ideal for all-weather golfing.
With its HD display, advanced slope switch technology, and weather-resistant build, it’s a true value for money if you’re looking for a less expensive but premium rangefinder for shaky hands.
What I like about this rangefinder
Good Value
Pulse Vibration Lock
Tournament Legal
Advanced Optics
What I don’t like about this rangefinder
It takes a second to hit the flag, but it is pretty accurate.
Water-resistant but not waterproof
The lightweight nature of this rangefinder makes it feel a little flimsy.
4. Callaway EZ Laser: Best for maneuverability
Callaway EZ Laser
$300
EZ Mode for effortless flagstick locking with a simple button press.
Impressive Pin Acquisition Technology (P.A.T.) for targeting the pin up to 275 yards away.
5X magnification ranging from 5-800 yards.
Remarkably accurate measurements within +/- 1 yard.
The EZ Mode, activated with a simple button press, effortlessly locks onto the flagstick for precise distances. Its Pin Acquisition Technology (P.A.T.) is impressive, allowing you to target the pin up to 275 yards away. The Magnahold feature, with integrated magnets, makes it a breeze to attach to golf carts.
What I love most is the exterior LCD, which confirms the internal distance reading, and the 5X magnification ranging between 5-800 yards. It’s remarkably accurate (+/- 1 yard) and has a built-in hand support strap that minimizes shakiness. Being water and fog-resistant adds to its appeal.
If you’re a senior golfer who often walks the course, you’ll appreciate its user-friendly design that doesn’t falter with shaky hands. The display size is excellent, but I did notice it struggled a bit in heavy fog on the first fairway.
Overall, I highly recommend the Callaway EZ Laser for its ease of use and impressive features.
What I like about this rangefinder
Easy to use
Magna holds great
A lightweight rangefinder
The built-in hand support strap minimizes shaking.
This device is the cream of the crop, boasting top-notch features, precision, and even PGA Tour adoption. More than 99% of professional golfers trust Bushnell.
The standout features include a slope-off indicator for tournament play, pinseeker and jolt technology for effortless flag-locking, and an exceptional display offering crystal-clear visibility up to 1,200 yards. With 6x magnification, a 21mm objective lens diameter, and 16mm eye relief, it’s got all the specs I need.
What I love most is the ability to switch off the slope for official play with a clear visual indicator. Thanks to the magnetic strip, it’s also a breeze to attach to my golf cart. Whether I’m capturing accurate distances to the green or targeting multiple points, the Tour V5 delivers. Plus, it has a range of 5–1,300 yards and an accuracy of 1 yard.
This rangefinder has all the bells and whistles, including slope calculation, which complements GPS measurements perfectly.
What I like about this rangefinder
Jolt Technology to make accurate reads easy with shaky hands
High-end rangefinder
Free Bushnell App access
Crystal clear display
Magnetic cart mount
What I don’t like about this rangefinder
Not waterproof
This rangefinder takes a few seconds longer than a few other options to key in on the flag pin.
Wrapping Up
Aside from budget constraints, shaky hands are a common reason many golfers avoid laser rangefinders. Fortunately, many manufacturers of these devices are incorporating technology that can get you accurate readings despite your ability to stabilize the unit.
However, it also depends on how you handle the device. You could spend up to $300 on a premium golf rangefinder for shaky hands and still see no difference if you don’t use the device properly.
If you have shaky hands, consider using two hands and flag lock technology when getting yardage. Still, a great rangefinder will allow for considerable movement, so your hand does not need to be held all that steady.
The products reviewed in this article work well for such purposes.
You can figure out the best cold-weather golf pants on your own once you pay attention to the size of the pants, the inseam, and the price range. However, not all golf pants advertised as ‘cold weather’ will give you warmth and protection from the elements.
The best pants to pick must combine waterproof or repellent slacks with rain or wind pants. With extensive research, testing, and combing through reviews of fellow golfers, these five golf pants rank as the best for the cold season:
Living in New Hampshire, playing deep into the fall is challenging. Still, I get to do it when possible, as long as I have the right golf gear. This is when cold-weather golf pants come in.
I’ll be slightly biased to highly recommend the Under Armour ColdGear Infrared Pants as the best for cold weather because they have worked for me so far. However, players’ preferences vary, as do weather conditions. That is why I deemed it fit to review a few other products that also work great.
Meanwhile, I have seen some golf buddies use heavier work pants and some fleece-lined jeans, but they don’t look great on the course because they get so much lower/body torso movement when swinging, so such a thermal base layer won’t work.
Before we dive fully into the review of these top recommendations, here’s a table I’ve prepared to compare them across relevant factors to help you make a quick decision in case you’re in a hurry:
Pants
Sizes
Colors
Waterproof/water-resistant
Price*
Under Armour ColdGear Infrared Pants
30, 32
Black, Navy
Repellant
$75
Nike Storm-FIT ADV Men’s Rain Pants
XL, XXL
Black
Waterproof
$155
Adidas Men’s Frostguard Insulated Pant
–
Black
Repellant
$65-$100
FootJoy DryJoys Tour L.T.S. Rain Pants
S, M, L, XL, XXL
Black
Waterproof
$215
Addidas Provisional Rain Pants
XXL
Black
repellant
$52
*at the time of publishing
As you read on to see what makes these golf pants stand out for cold weather conditions, you’ll realize why they are top recommendations. During my search and testing, I prioritized insulated, moisture-wicking, and wind-resistant options.
Materials like fleece-lined or thermal fabric are common in high-quality golf pants for cold weather, with a snug fit to retain warmth. Some even feature zippered pockets and adjustable waistbands for extra comfort and functionality.
Here’s my full review of the top options to help you decide the best fit.
1. Under Armour ColdGear Infrared Pants
Under Armour ColdGear Infrared Pants
$75
Designed to provide warmth in sub-40-degree temperatures
Water-repellent and breathable
The stretch fabric allows for easy movement and flexibility, crucial for a golf swing
Suitable for golfers facing temperatures between 40 and 60 degrees
The ColdGear Infrared technology works like a charm, trapping body heat while staying lightweight. Plus, they repel water without sacrificing breathability, making them versatile. I compared this with my bulky fleece pants for sub-40 temps, and they keep me warm without the added weight.
Excellent golf pants for chilly weather between 40 and 60 degrees. The moisture-wicking material will keep you dry, and the 4-way stretch allows easy movement.
The comfy waistband is a bonus. They’re perfect for workouts in the cold!
What I like about this golf pant
The stretch waistband helps create the perfect fit.
Keep you warm in chilly weather, but not too hot when the temperature rises.
Not bulky
Very warm, but you won’t sweat.
What I don’t like about this golf pant
It’s pricey compared to many other options, but it’s worth it!
2. Nike Storm-FIT ADV Men’s Rain Pants
Nike Storm-FIT ADV Men’s Rain Pants
$155
These pants are designed to provide protection against wind and rain
The added stretch allows for unrestricted movement during golf swings and while walking on the course
Nike’s technology combines windproof and waterproof materials
Nike Storm-FIT ADV Men’s Rain Pants may be a turnoff for buyers under the $100 budget, but they’re a great pair of pants for cold weather.
These pants have covered you, whether it’s early tee times or unexpected rain. The added stretch is a real plus, allowing unrestricted movement during swings and walks on the green.
I like how Nike uses their Storm-FIT ADV technology in this one to combine windproof and waterproof materials with smart engineering to ensure comfort in harsh weather.
The fabric is slightly stretchy and fully seam-sealed, providing freedom of movement while keeping you dry.
They come in a standard fit for that relaxed feel, with convenient hand pockets and water-repellent zippers.
These machine-washable trousers feature ankle zips and a tapered fit, ensuring my golf game remains unaffected by water and grass stains.
If you’re a newcomer to winter golf attire, these pants are an ideal starting point. They offer a snug fit, high-quality fabric, and exceptional performance, keeping you warm and helping you perform at your best.
These winter golf trousers excel in fit, material, and functionality, making them perfect for chilly rounds. Plus, the PFC-free water repellent finish provides decent windproofing.
What I like about this golf pant
Like others on the list, these pants are machine washable.
Front and back pockets for great utility
Moderately priced
What I don’t like about this golf pant
It is just a black option, which is sad for those who like to rock Addidas in other colors.
It is not as thick as other options in its class.
4. FootJoy DryJoys Tour L.T.S. Rain Pants
FootJoy DryJoys Tour L.T.S. Rain Pants
$215
ThermoLite technology and DWR finish for warmth and protection in mist or light rain.
Gripper elastic waistband ensures a snug, slip-free fit.
100% waterproof guarantee for two years, backed by a 3.5-hour round.
Multiple pockets for storing gloves, scorecards, tee/ball markers, and more.
Firstly, the ThermoLite technology and DWR finish of these FootJoy DryJoys Tour L.T.S. Rain Pants keep you warm and dry, even in mist or light rain. The side pockets add convenience, and the gripper elastic waistband ensures a snug, slip-free fit.
What truly amazed me was the 100% waterproof guarantee for two years, which they lived up to during my 3.5-hour round. They’re comfortable, easy to put on and take off, and offer adjustability.
Though they come at a price, I believe these rainpants are worth every penny. I can’t wait to add the matching jacket to my golf gear collection.
The fabric of the Addidas Provisional Rain Pants not only blocks wind and water effectively, ensuring comfort all day, but it also allows for natural movement as you tackle the course.
The elastic waist with a draw cord provides a secure fit. Made of 73% polyester and 27% recycled polyester poplin, they are both environmentally friendly and functional, featuring wind-resistant and water-repellent WIND.RDY technology.
The front and back pockets make them convenient to carry in case of rain without being bulky. They offer excellent rain protection and represent great value.
I suggest going for your regular size if you plan to wear them as pants but consider a lighter underlayer to prevent sticking when sweating. Sizing up would be a good choice if you intend to wear them over shorts or pants.
What I like about this golf pant
Fit great.
Easy on/off.
Pack down to a small size.
Super affordable
It still looks good when you pull them out for use.
They look much more expensive than they are.
What I don’t like about this golf pant
None so far.
Final Thoughts: Golf Pants vs. Layering for Cold Weather
Many golfers have the opinion that layering is best in cold weather, instead of buying a golf pant that preaches waterproofing. I have tried wearing my regular golf pants with warm compression pants underneath, and I can tell you that it keeps you away from weather issues.
However, it’s not as good as having the ColdGear line on you. Even if you don’t justify spending close to $200 for a new set of golf pants, you can get some compression tights, a pair of thermal long johns, and a $12 pair of pants from Walmart.
This can keep you warm and flexible enough for your golf activity instead of being “swollen” from tiring layering.
The problem with layering is that you would still need to remove the underlayer if you spent some time in the clubhouse after the round.
So, you still need a good pair of waterproof golf trousers that you can wear the whole time, rather than ones you would pull over the trousers you already wear.
I hope this article has helped you decide on your best choice.
